Literature DB >> 12519191

DNA gyrase requirements distinguish the alternate pathways of Mu transposition.

Tanya D Sokolsky1, Tania A Baker.   

Abstract

The MuA transposase mediates transposition of bacteriophage Mu through two distinct mechanisms. The first integration event following infection occurs through a non-replicative mechanism. In contrast, during lytic growth, multiple rounds of replicative transposition amplify the phage genome. We have examined the influence of gyrase and DNA supercoiling on these two transposition pathways using both a gyrase-inhibiting drug and several distinct gyrase mutants. These experiments reveal that gyrase activity is not essential for integration; both lysogens and recombination intermediates are detected when gyrase is inhibited during Mu infection. In contrast, gyrase inhibition causes severe defects in replicative transposition. In two of the mutants, as well as in drug-treated cells, replicative transposition is almost completely blocked. Experiments probing for formation of MuA-DNA complexes in vivo reveal that this block occurs very early, during assembly of the transposase complex required for the catalytic steps of recombination. The findings establish that DNA structure-based signals are used differently for integrative and replicative transposition. We propose that transposase assembly, the committed step for recombination, has evolved to depend on different DNA /architectural signals to control the reaction outcome during these two distinct phases of the phage life cycle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12519191     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03296.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  11 in total

1.  DNA repair by the cryptic endonuclease activity of Mu transposase.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chromosomal integration mechanism of infecting mu virion DNA.

Authors:  T K Au; Pushpa Agrawal; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

Review 4.  Application of the bacteriophage Mu-driven system for the integration/amplification of target genes in the chromosomes of engineered Gram-negative bacteria--mini review.

Authors:  Valerii Z Akhverdyan; Evgueni R Gak; Irina L Tokmakova; Nataliya V Stoynova; Yurgis A V Yomantas; Sergey V Mashko
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Repair of clustered uracil DNA damages in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Dwain I D'souza; Lynn Harrison
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Mu-like prophage strong gyrase site sequences: analysis of properties required for promoting efficient mu DNA replication.

Authors:  Mark Oram; Martin L Pato
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Dissection of the bacteriophage Mu strong gyrase site (SGS): significance of the SGS right arm in Mu biology and DNA gyrase mechanism.

Authors:  Mark Oram; Andrew A Travers; Alison J Howells; Anthony Maxwell; Martin L Pato
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  A new role for translation initiation factor 2 in maintaining genome integrity.

Authors:  K Elizabeth Madison; Mona R Abdelmeguid; Erica N Jones-Foster; Hiroshi Nakai
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Genomic sequence and activity of KS10, a transposable phage of the Burkholderia cepacia complex.

Authors:  Amanda D Goudie; Karlene H Lynch; Kimberley D Seed; Paul Stothard; Savita Shrivastava; David S Wishart; Jonathan J Dennis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Transposable prophage Mu is organized as a stable chromosomal domain of E. coli.

Authors:  Rudra P Saha; Zheng Lou; Luke Meng; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.