Literature DB >> 12518708

Clinical trial simulation using therapeutic effect modeling: application to ivabradine efficacy in patients with angina pectoris.

Sylvie Chabaud1, Pascal Girard, Patrice Nony, Jean-Pierre Boissel.   

Abstract

Ivabradine is a new bradycardic agent with a potential indication for stable angina pectoris. To investigate the best compromise between efficacy, safety, drug regimen, and number of patients to include in a phase III study, we conducted Monte Carlo simulations using a full therapeutic model. The binary clinical outcome, chest pain, was simulated using a physiologic model in which the coronary reserve was derived from the heart rate. Safety was defined as being heart rate dependent. Using real data to build a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model controlling drug effect (i.e., heart rate decrease), and resampling heart rate profiles from the database, 100 clinical trials (N = 200) were simulated for five oral doses (2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 mg QD or BID) of ivabradine. Only 25% of the simulated trials showed a significant effect of ivabradine with doses up to 10 mg QD, and 48 and 55% of the trials with doses of 10 mg BID and 20 mg QD, respectively, and more than 80% of the trials with a 40 mg daily dose. For safety, 4% of patients had at least one adverse event in the untreated group, and from 5 to 13% in the treated groups for the lowest to the highest dose, respectively. The number of subjects to include in a future trial to obtain a 15% decrease in chest pain under the assumption of a 68% base risk, is 239 subjects per group with 10 mg BID or 196 with 20 mg QD. These results illustrate how clinical trial simulations including a PK/PD model as well as a physiopathologic mechanistic model, describing the relationship between the intermediate and clinical endpoint, and the resampling of real patients from a large database can help in designing future phase III trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12518708     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020953107162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  30 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  In silico studies of energy metabolism of normal and diseased heart.

Authors:  S M Ngai; M M Way; H Chan; S K Tsui; C Y Lee; K P Fung
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Development of a sequential linked pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic simulation model for ivabradine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S B Duffull; L Aarons
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.384

4.  A pharmacokinetic simulation model for ivabradine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S B Duffull; S Chabaud; P Nony; C Laveille; P Girard; L Aarons
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.384

5.  Normal sinus heart rate redefined.

Authors:  D H Spodick
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of the effects of ivabradine, a direct sinus node inhibitor, on heart rate in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  I Ragueneau; C Laveille; R Jochemsen; G Resplandy; C Funck-Brentano; P Jaillon
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  A mathematical model for dynamics of cardiovascular drug action: application to intravenous dihydropyridines in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  P Francheteau; J L Steimer; H Merdjan; M Guerret; C Dubray
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-10

8.  Addition of zatebradine, a direct sinus node inhibitor, provides no greater exercise tolerance benefit in patients with angina taking extended-release nifedipine: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. The Zatebradine Study Group.

Authors:  W H Frishman; C J Pepine; R J Weiss; W M Baiker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Abnormal electrocardiograms and cardiovascular risk: role of silent myocardial ischemia. Evidence from MRFIT.

Authors:  J D Cohen
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-16       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; J Bartunek; S U Sys; G R Heyndrickx
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  17 in total

1.  Estimating bias in population parameters for some models for repeated measures ordinal data using NONMEM and NLMIXED.

Authors:  Siv Jönsson; Maria C Kjellsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Population pharmacokinetic studies in pediatrics: issues in design and analysis.

Authors:  Bernd Meibohm; Stephanie Läer; John C Panetta; Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Modelling response time profiles in the absence of drug concentrations: definition and performance evaluation of the K-PD model.

Authors:  P Jacqmin; E Snoeck; E A van Schaick; R Gieschke; P Pillai; J-L Steimer; P Girard
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 4.  Are population pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic models adequately evaluated? A survey of the literature from 2002 to 2004.

Authors:  Karl Brendel; Céline Dartois; Emmanuelle Comets; Annabelle Lemenuel-Diot; Christian Laveille; Brigitte Tranchand; Pascal Girard; Céline M Laffont; France Mentré
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Simulating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic fuzzy-parameterized models: a comparison of numerical methods.

Authors:  Kok-Yong Seng; Ivan Nestorov; Paolo Vicini
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 2.745

6.  The impact of misspecification of residual error or correlation structure on the type I error rate for covariate inclusion.

Authors:  Hanna E Silber; Maria C Kjellsson; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  Performance in population models for count data, part I: maximum likelihood approximations.

Authors:  Elodie L Plan; Alan Maloney; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Mats O Karlsson
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Simulation of correlated continuous and categorical variables using a single multivariate distribution.

Authors:  Stacey J Tannenbaum; Nicholas H G Holford; Howard Lee; Carl C Peck; Diane R Mould
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 2.745

9.  Model-based approaches for ivabradine development in paediatric population, part II: PK and PK/PD assessment.

Authors:  Sophie Peigné; Sylvain Fouliard; Sophie Decourcelle; Marylore Chenel
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 10.  Facilitation of drug evaluation in children by population methods and modelling.

Authors:  Michel Tod; Vincent Jullien; Gérard Pons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.