Literature DB >> 12509694

Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer.

D Debnath1, N Dielehner, K A Gunning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Department of Health had recently introduced guidelines so that all suspected colorectal cancer patients could be seen by a specialist within two weeks of referral by their general practitioners. The usefulness and practicality of such a decision had been questioned. The aims of this study were to measure the compliance to the guidelines and evaluate the effectiveness of such referrals.
METHODS: All patients who were referred to the rapid access colorectal clinic between August 2000 and July 2001 were included. SETTINGS: Darlington Memorial Hospital and Bishop Auckland General Hospital, both under South Durham Health Care Trust, were considered for the study. MEASURES: Date of referral, referring practitioner, time of appointment, reasons for referral, and diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total of 239 referrals were made; 96.2% of patients were given appointments within two weeks. Rectal bleed was the commonest (32%) cause for referral. Diverticular disease was the most frequent (29%) condition diagnosed. Altogether 97.4% of referrals were incomplete and 37.6% did not comply with the guidelines. Twenty one colorectal cancers (8.9%) were diagnosed. The early cancer detection rate was 4.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: This audit showed that compliance to the guidelines was associated with a higher cancer detection rate. The majority of patients received appointments within two weeks. Contrary to some speculations, the number of referrals was not limitless. However a high number of referrals failed to adhere to the guidelines. The cancer (particularly early cancer) detection rate was disappointingly low. This does not reflect an efficient system of referral and potential benefits to patients remain questionable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12509694      PMCID: PMC1757929          DOI: 10.1136/pmj.78.926.748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  7 in total

1.  Is it time to review the idea of compliance with guidelines?

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  New guidelines for urgent referral of patients with cancer are waste of energy.

Authors:  K Sikora
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-01

3.  Referral and diagnostic process in suspected colorectal cancer needs to be improved to achieve two week target.

Authors:  C Riesewyk; C Hawyard; V Enser; J Northover
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

4.  Referral guidelines for colorectal cancer: a threat or a challenge?

Authors:  M K Baig; C G Marks
Journal:  Hosp Med       Date:  2000-07

5.  New guidelines for urgent referral of patients with cancer. The initiative should not be dismissed.

Authors:  E Davies; B van der Molen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

6.  New guidelines for urgent referral of patients with cancer. Patients will have a dignified end to life.

Authors:  N Summerton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-27

7.  Sustaining general practice.

Authors:  N D Olsen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-02
  7 in total
  18 in total

1.  Urgent GP referrals for suspected lung, colorectal, prostate and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Victoria L Allgar; Richard D Neal; Nasreen Ali; Brenda Leese; Phil Heywood; Gill Proctor; Joyce Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

3.  The gap between practice and guidelines in the choice of first-line disease modifying antirheumatic drug in early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ESPOIR cohort.

Authors:  Mathilde Benhamou; Nathalie Rincheval; Carine Roy; Violaine Foltz; Sylvie Rozenberg; Jean Sibilia; Thierry Schaeverbeke; Pierre Bourgeois; Philippe Ravaud; Bruno Fautrel
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  The effectiveness of a rapid-access flexible sigmoidoscopy clinic in a district hospital.

Authors:  Paolo G Sorelli; Alex D Iliadis; John G Payne
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

5.  Prospective analysis of scrotal pathology referrals - are referrals appropriate and accurate?

Authors:  Paul W Foster; Alastair W S Ritchie; David J Jones
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer diagnosis: Pitfalls and opportunities.

Authors:  Pablo Vega; Fátima Valentín; Joaquín Cubiella
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 7.  Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Petra Jellema; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; David J Bruinvels; Christian D Mallen; Stijn J B van Weyenberg; Chris J Mulder; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-31

8.  Prospective evaluation of a novel one-stop testicular clinic.

Authors:  Mark Rochester; Sue Scurrell; John R W Parry
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Audit of two-week rule referrals for suspected testicular cancer in Cornwall, 2003-2005.

Authors:  Prakash Kumaraswamy; Robert Cox; John S O'Rourke; Robert G Willis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  A prospective study of peri-diagnostic and surgical wait times for patients with presumptive colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  E Grunfeld; J M Watters; R Urquhart; K O'Rourke; J Jaffey; D E Maziak; C Morash; D Patel; W K Evans
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.