Literature DB >> 16834856

Prospective analysis of scrotal pathology referrals - are referrals appropriate and accurate?

Paul W Foster1, Alastair W S Ritchie, David J Jones.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Testicular cancer is a relatively uncommon, treatable condition. A general practitioner would expect to see, on average, one case of testicular cancer in the whole of their career. Benign scrotal conditions are extremely common and the source of many primary care consultations. The main patient expectations of these attendances are accurate diagnosis and adequate re-assurance as often they are the source of much anxiety and perceived embarrassment. The aim of this study was to examine the content and referral practice of primary care referral of testicular pathology and the resultant findings of the specialist practitioner. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 201 patients referred with scrotal pathology were prospectively analysed at the time of specialist practitioner assessment by means of data recording in a urological surgery unit and regional peripheral community clinics.
RESULTS: In the study group, 53 patients were referred under the 2-week rule. Of these, 9 (17%) were found to have testicular cancer. Five (36%) cancers were referred outside the 2-week rule referrals; 1 cancer was missed and 2 diagnoses delayed. In total, 44% of final clinical diagnoses differed between the referring primary care physician and the specialist practitioner. Of the 71 (35%) patients referred with a suspicion of cancer, 62 (87%) were subsequently found to be of clinically benign pathology. Overall, 80% of patients were referred more urgently than the opinion of the specialist practitioner.
CONCLUSIONS: Scrotal examination in the primary care setting appears to be of variable accuracy. Many patients referred with a high suspicion of cancer are found to have benign pathology. Two-week rule referrals have an acceptable positive predictive value for testicular cancer (17%). Disagreements exist in the referral priority of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16834856      PMCID: PMC1964653          DOI: 10.1308/003588406X106540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  10 in total

1.  Referral and diagnostic process in suspected colorectal cancer needs to be improved to achieve two week target.

Authors:  C Riesewyk; C Hawyard; V Enser; J Northover
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

2.  Two week rule for cancer referrals. All stages of care pathway need speeding up.

Authors:  M D Oliver
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-13

3.  Two week rule for cancer referrals. Specialists, not GPs, may be best qualified to assess urgency.

Authors:  P Sauven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-13

4.  Two week rule for cancer referrals. Reducing waiting times from diagnosis to treatment might be more effective.

Authors:  S Thomas; N Burnet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-13

5.  Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?

Authors:  R Jones; G Rubin; P Hungin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-30

6.  Clinical versus ultrasonographic evaluation of scrotal disorders.

Authors:  B Kromann-Andersen; L B Hansen; P N Larsen; K Lawetz; P Lynge; D Lysen; S P Nielsen; K H Stockholm; P Foged
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1988-04

7.  Has the breast cancer 'two week wait' guarantee for assessment made any difference?

Authors:  A R Khawaja; S M Allan
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  Young men's knowledge of testicular cancer and testicular self-examination: a lost opportunity?

Authors:  R A Moore; A Topping
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.520

9.  Referral patterns to a district general hospital gastroenterology outpatient clinic: implications for the 'two-week target'.

Authors:  J P Martin; S M Gabe; M C L Pitcher; M R Jacyna
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Guidelines, compliance, and effectiveness: a 12 months' audit in an acute district general healthcare trust on the two week rule for suspected colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D Debnath; N Dielehner; K A Gunning
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.401

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Scrotal signs and symptoms in the general population, the value of testis self-examination and the pitfalls of a scrotal screening programme: is the two-week rule relevant?

Authors:  R G Casey; R Grainger; M Butler; T E D McDermott; J A Thornhill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prospective evaluation of a novel one-stop testicular clinic.

Authors:  Mark Rochester; Sue Scurrell; John R W Parry
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Audit of two-week rule referrals for suspected testicular cancer in Cornwall, 2003-2005.

Authors:  Prakash Kumaraswamy; Robert Cox; John S O'Rourke; Robert G Willis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Testicular Cancer and Testicular Self-Examination; Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice in Final Year Medical Students in Nigeria

Authors:  Fred O Ugwumba; Osa Eloka C Ekwueme; Agharighom D Okoh
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2016-11-01

5.  Urologist led one-stop testicular clinic: the UK 'gold standard'.

Authors:  David Muthuveloe; Nkwam Nkwam; Paul Hutton; D M A Wallace; Richard Viney; Prashant Patel
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-01-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.