Literature DB >> 12509109

MRI safety review.

Mary F Dempsey1, Barrie Condon, Donald M Hadley.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance is an extremely powerful imaging tool which does not expose patients to ionizing radiation. However, there are risks associated with the MR environment which all staff must be aware of and eliminate. The aim of this article is to highlight the well known and not so well known potentially adverse interactions. Although many safety investigations have been carried out at up to 1.5T, the reader will be reminded that as many centres install magnets of 2.0T and above, much of the current safety literature cannot be simply extrapolated to these higher field strengths and further investigations will be required to reassure staff and patients of the limits of their safe use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12509109     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2171(02)90010-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR        ISSN: 0887-2171            Impact factor:   1.875


  15 in total

1.  Invisible metallic microfiber in clothing presents unrecognized MRI risk for cutaneous burn.

Authors:  J A Pietryga; M A Fonder; J M Rogg; D L North; L G Bercovitch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  High relaxivity Gd(III)-DNA gold nanostars: investigation of shape effects on proton relaxation.

Authors:  Matthew W Rotz; Kayla S B Culver; Giacomo Parigi; Keith W MacRenaris; Claudio Luchinat; Teri W Odom; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 3.  Safety concerns related to magnetic field exposure.

Authors:  Amanda K Andriola Silva; Erica L Silva; E Sócrates T Egito; Artur S Carriço
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  [MR implant labelling and its use in clinical MRI practice].

Authors:  M Mühlenweg; G Schaefers
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Gd(III)-Dithiolane Gold Nanoparticles for T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas.

Authors:  Robert J Holbrook; Nikhil Rammohan; Matthew W Rotz; Keith W MacRenaris; Adam T Preslar; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 11.189

6.  Clinical safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with implanted SynchroMed EL infusion pumps.

Authors:  Felix E Diehn; Christopher P Wood; Robert E Watson; William D Mauck; Michelle M Burke; Christopher H Hunt
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Burns from ECG leads in an MRI scanner: Case series and discussion of mechanisms.

Authors:  S Abdel-Rehim; S Bagirathan; S Al-Benna; C O'Boyle
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2014-12-31

8.  MRI as a problem-solving tool in unexplained failed total hip replacement following conventional assessment.

Authors:  Ciaran Johnston; Jennifer Kerr; Stephanie Ford; John O'byrne; Stephen Eustace
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  [Whole-body ferromagnetic detector systems in clinical MRI].

Authors:  F V Güttler; A Heinrich; U K Teichgräber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Discomfort in children undergoing unsedated MRI.

Authors:  Anna E Westra; Maria P A Zegers; Rám N Sukhai; Ad A Kaptein; Herma C Holscher; Bart E P B Ballieux; Erik W van Zwet; Jan M Wit
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.