Literature DB >> 12509017

Auditory processing efficiency deficits in children with developmental language impairments.

Douglas E H Hartley1, David R Moore.   

Abstract

The "temporal processing hypothesis" suggests that individuals with specific language impairments (SLIs) and dyslexia have severe deficits in processing rapidly presented or brief sensory information, both within the auditory and visual domains. This hypothesis has been supported through evidence that language-impaired individuals have excess auditory backward masking. This paper presents an analysis of masking results from several studies in terms of a model of temporal resolution. Results from this modeling suggest that the masking results can be better explained by an "auditory efficiency" hypothesis. If impaired or immature listeners have a normal temporal window, but require a higher signal-to-noise level (poor processing efficiency), this hypothesis predicts the observed small deficits in the simultaneous masking task, and the much larger deficits in backward and forward masking tasks amongst those listeners. The difference in performance on these masking tasks is predictable from the compressive nonlinearity of the basilar membrane. The model also correctly predicts that backward masking (i) is more prone to training effects, (ii) has greater inter- and intrasubject variability, and (iii) increases less with masker level than do other masking tasks. These findings provide a new perspective on the mechanisms underlying communication disorders and auditory masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12509017     DOI: 10.1121/1.1512701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  13 in total

1.  Learning problems, delayed development, and puberty.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Steven G Zecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  An examination of speech recognition in a modulated background and of forward masking in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon; Erica J Williams
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Computational modeling of individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-30

5.  The monaural temporal window based on masking period pattern data in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Shuman He; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of Gap Position on Perceptual Gap Detection Across Late Childhood and Adolescence.

Authors:  Jennifer D Gay; Merri J Rosen; Julia Jones Huyck
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-02

7.  Auditory filter shapes and high-frequency hearing in adults who have impaired speech in noise performance despite clinically normal audiograms.

Authors:  Rohima Badri; Jonathan H Siegel; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Monaural temporal integration and temporally selective listening in children and adults.

Authors:  Shuman He; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory scene analysis in school-aged children with developmental language disorders.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; W Lee; K Lawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Evaluating cortical responses to speech in children: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

Authors:  Rachael J Lawrence; Ian M Wiggins; Jessica C Hodgson; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.