Literature DB >> 12504766

Spontaneous tandem-base mutations (TBM) show dramatic tissue, age, pattern and spectrum specificity.

Kathleen A Hill1, Jicheng Wang, Kelly D Farwell, Steve S Sommer.   

Abstract

To supplement a previous analysis of spontaneous tandem-base mutations (TBM) in the lacI gene of Big Blue((R)) mice, 2658 additional mutants were sequenced from 13 tissues and 44 spontaneous TBM were identified (tripling the sample size). Previous findings were confirmed and generalized and several new observations were made. TBM differ from single and other double mutations in that TBM frequency varies dramatically with tissue type. In certain tissues, most notably male germ cells, no TBM are observed despite screening as many as 26 million plaque forming units. TBM are most frequent in kidney and liver (3.45 and 2x10(-6), respectively), accounting for 7.6 and 4.8% of all mutational events in kidney and liver, respectively. There is a trend for elevated TBM frequency in thymic lymphomas in p53-deficient mice. TBM are more frequent in old age in both liver and kidney. TBM differ from single mutations and other double mutations because they display a marked difference in pattern and dramatic tissue specificity for target sequence. Five of the 78 possible TBM outcomes comprise 79% of those observed, and mutations at GG/CC predominate. TBM in mice were compared with TBM found in human mutation databases. TBM are also rare in the human germline (one in 5133 germline mutations reported in five human mutation databases). In general, the types of somatic TBM are similar in mice and humans except for an excess of TG/CA to CA/TG TBM in humans (TBM related to ultraviolet light-induced skin cancer were excluded). TBM may be the result of unknown mechanisms that may have some similarities in mice and humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12504766     DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5718(02)00277-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  5 in total

1.  Evidence for mutation showers.

Authors:  Jicheng Wang; Kelly D Gonzalez; William A Scaringe; Kimberly Tsai; Ning Liu; Dongqing Gu; Wenyan Li; Kathleen A Hill; Steve S Sommer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Somatic microindels in human cancer: the insertions are highly error-prone and derive from nearby but not adjacent sense and antisense templates.

Authors:  William A Scaringe; Kai Li; Dongqing Gu; Kelly D Gonzalez; Zhenbin Chen; Kathleen A Hill; Steve S Sommer
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

3.  Epidemiology of doublet/multiplet mutations in lung cancers: evidence that a subset arises by chronocoordinate events.

Authors:  Zhenbin Chen; Jinong Feng; Carolyn H Buzin; Steve S Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer.

Authors:  Ludmil B Alexandrov; Jaegil Kim; Gad Getz; Steven G Rozen; Michael R Stratton; Nicholas J Haradhvala; Mi Ni Huang; Alvin Wei Tian Ng; Yang Wu; Arnoud Boot; Kyle R Covington; Dmitry A Gordenin; Erik N Bergstrom; S M Ashiqul Islam; Nuria Lopez-Bigas; Leszek J Klimczak; John R McPherson; Sandro Morganella; Radhakrishnan Sabarinathan; David A Wheeler; Ville Mustonen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Analysis of cancer mutation signatures in blood by a novel ultra-sensitive assay: monitoring of therapy or recurrence in non-metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhenbin Chen; Jinong Feng; Carolyn H Buzin; Qiang Liu; Lawrence Weiss; Kemp Kernstine; George Somlo; Steve S Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.