Literature DB >> 18632684

Somatic microindels in human cancer: the insertions are highly error-prone and derive from nearby but not adjacent sense and antisense templates.

William A Scaringe1, Kai Li, Dongqing Gu, Kelly D Gonzalez, Zhenbin Chen, Kathleen A Hill, Steve S Sommer.   

Abstract

Somatic microindels (microdeletions with microinsertions) have been studied in normal mouse tissues using the Big Blue lacI transgenic mutation detection system. Here we analyze microindels in human cancers using an endogenous and transcribed gene, the TP53 gene. Microindel frequency, the enhancement of 1-2 microindels and other features are generally similar to that observed in the non-transcribed lacI gene in normal mouse tissues. The current larger sample of somatic microindels reveals recurroids: mutations in which deletions are identical and the co-localized insertion is similar. The data reveal that the inserted sequences derive from nearby but not adjacent sequences in contrast to the slippage that characterizes the great majority of pure microinsertions. The microindel inserted sequences derive from a template on the sense or antisense strand with similar frequency. The estimated error rate of the insertion process of 13% per bp is by far the largest reported in vivo, with the possible exception of somatic hypermutation in the immunoglobulin gene. The data constrain possible mechanisms of microindels and raise the question of whether microindels are 'scars' from the bypass of large DNA adducts by a translesional polymerase, e.g. the 'Tarzan model' presented herein.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18632684      PMCID: PMC2722894          DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddn190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  36 in total

Review 1.  The expanding polymerase universe.

Authors:  M F Goodman; B Tippin
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Error-prone DNA polymerases: novel structures and the benefits of infidelity.

Authors:  E C Friedberg; P L Fischhaber; C Kisker
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Participation of mouse DNA polymerase iota in strand-biased mutagenic bypass of UV photoproducts and suppression of skin cancer.

Authors:  Chad A Dumstorf; Alan B Clark; Qingcong Lin; Grace E Kissling; Tao Yuan; Raju Kucherlapati; W Glenn McGregor; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Multiple solutions to inefficient lesion bypass by T7 DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-07-28

5.  Mutagenicity in lung of big Blue((R)) mice and induction of tandem-base substitutions in Salmonella by the air pollutant peroxyacetyl nitrate (PAN): predicted formation of intrastrand cross-links.

Authors:  D M DeMarini; M L Shelton; M J Kohan; E E Hudgens; T E Kleindienst; L M Ball; D Walsh; J G de Boer; L Lewis-Bevan; J R Rabinowitz; L D Claxton; J Lewtas
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  Error rate and specificity of human and murine DNA polymerase eta.

Authors:  T Matsuda; K Bebenek; C Masutani; I B Rogozin; F Hanaoka; T A Kunkel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Spontaneous microdeletions and microinsertions in a transgenic mouse mutation detection system: analysis of age, tissue, and sequence specificity.

Authors:  A Halangoda; J G Still; K A Hill; S S Sommer
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.216

8.  poliota, a remarkably error-prone human DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Tissier; J P McDonald; E G Frank; R Woodgate
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  EGFR somatic doublets in lung cancer are frequent and generally arise from a pair of driver mutations uncommonly seen as singlet mutations: one-third of doublets occur at five pairs of amino acids.

Authors:  Z Chen; J Feng; J-S Saldivar; D Gu; A Bockholt; S S Sommer
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Database of somatic mutations in EGFR with analyses revealing indel hotspots but no smoking-associated signature.

Authors:  Dongqing Gu; William A Scaringe; Kai Li; Juan-Sebastian Saldivar; Kathleen A Hill; Zhenbin Chen; Kelly D Gonzalez; Steve S Sommer
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.878

View more
  3 in total

1.  PARP1 and DNA-PKcs synergize to suppress p53 mutation and telomere fusions during T-lineage lymphomagenesis.

Authors:  I Rybanska; O Ishaq; J Chou; M Prakash; J Bakhsheshian; D L Huso; S Franco
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Dual roles for DNA polymerase theta in alternative end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sze Ham Chan; Amy Marie Yu; Mitch McVey
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  Synthesis-dependent microhomology-mediated end joining accounts for multiple types of repair junctions.

Authors:  Amy Marie Yu; Mitch McVey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 19.160

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.