Literature DB >> 12503096

What do ratings of cancer-specific distress mean among women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer?

James C Coyne1, Linda Kruus, Melissa Racioppo, Kathleen A Calzone, Katrina Armstrong.   

Abstract

Women recruited from a hereditary cancer registry provided ratings of distress associated with different aspects of high-risk status and genetic testing and completed measures of general psychological distress, emotional and social health, and role functioning. Overall, high-risk status was rated as more distressing than undergoing genetic testing. Women without a personal history of cancer rated the level of distress associated with a positive test result to be greater than that associated with high-risk status. In contrast, level of distress associated with a positive test result was not significantly different from that associated with high-risk status for women with a personal history of cancer. Furthermore, women with a personal cancer history also anticipated that if they had an altered gene associated with increased risk of cancer, it would be less distressing than their diagnosis of cancer had been. Women with the highest ratings of cancer-related stress were less inclined to obtain testing, but were not more generally distressed or maladjusted. The need to interpret psychological distress and the stressfulness of genetic testing among high-risk women with respect to relevant comparison data is discussed. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12503096     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  12 in total

Review 1.  Measurement of psychological factors associated with genetic testing for hereditary breast, ovarian and colon cancers.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Mary Ropka; Michael E Stefanek
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Preserving the self: the process of decision making about hereditary breast cancer and ovarian cancer risk reduction.

Authors:  A Fuchsia Howard; Lynda G Balneaves; Joan L Bottorff; Patricia Rodney
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-10-27

3.  Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure.

Authors:  E Claes; G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; M Decruyenaere; A Boogaerts; K Philippe; E Legius
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Long-term psychosocial outcomes of BRCA1/BRCA2 testing: differences across affected status and risk-reducing surgery choice.

Authors:  Kristi D Graves; Patti Vegella; Elizabeth A Poggi; Beth N Peshkin; Angie Tong; Claudine Isaacs; Clinton Finch; Scott Kelly; Kathryn L Taylor; George Luta; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Marci Lobel; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Predictors of cancer worry in unaffected women from high risk breast cancer families: risk perception is not the primary issue.

Authors:  Melanie Anne Price; Phyllis Noami Butow; Sing Kai Lo; Judy Wilson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Christine Rini; Rachel E Goldsmith; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Lawrence H Cohen; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria Schipper; Herman F J Ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  A Counselling Model for BRCA1/2 Genetic Susceptibility Testing.

Authors:  Iris van Oostrom; Aad Tibben
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  BRCA1 testing with definitive results: a prospective study of psychological distress in a large clinic-based sample.

Authors:  Jon G Reichelt; Ketil Heimdal; Pål Møller; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.