Literature DB >> 12502156

A sociotechnical method for designing work systems.

Patrick E Waterson1, Melanie T Older Gray, Chris W Clegg.   

Abstract

The paper describes a new method for allocating work between and among humans and machines. The method consists of a series of stages, which cover how the overall work system should be organized and designed; how tasks within the work system should be allocated (human-human allocations); and how tasks involving the use of technology should be allocated (human-machine allocations). The method makes use of a series of decision criteria that allow end users to consider a range of factors relevant to function allocation, including aspects of job, organizational, and technological design. The method is described in detail using an example drawn from a workshop involving the redesign of a naval command and control (C2) subsystem. We also report preliminary details of the evaluation of the method, based on the views of participants at the workshop. A final section outlines the contribution of the work in terms of current theoretical developments within the domain of function allocation. The method has been applied to the domain of naval C2 systems; however, it is also designed for generic use within function allocation and sociotechnical work systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12502156     DOI: 10.1518/0018720024497628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  3 in total

Review 1.  Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Laurie L Novak; Kevin B Johnson; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety.

Authors:  Patrick Waterson; Michelle M Robertson; Nancy J Cooke; Laura Militello; Emilie Roth; Neville A Stanton
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Designing for Adaptation in Workers' Individual Behaviors and Collective Structures With Cognitive Work Analysis: Case Study of the Diagram of Work Organization Possibilities.

Authors:  Ben Elix; Neelam Naikar
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.888

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.