Literature DB >> 12500275

Clinical blood flow quantification with segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping.

George P Chatzimavroudis1, Haosen Zhang, Sandra S Halliburton, James R Moore, Orlando P Simonetti, Paulo R Schvartzman, Arthur E Stillman, Richard D White.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (PVM) in quantifying aortic blood flow from through-plane velocity measurements.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two segmented PVM schemes were evaluated, one with seven lines per segment (seg-7) and one with nine lines per segment (seg-9), in twenty patients with cardiovascular disease. A non-segmented (non-seg) PVM acquisition was also performed to provide the reference data.
RESULTS: There was agreement between the aortic flow curves acquired with segmented and non-segmented PVM. The calculated systolic and total flow volume per cycle from the seg-7 and the seg-9 scans correlated and agreed with the flow volumes from the non-seg scans (differences < 5%). Sign tests showed that there were no statistically significant differences (P-values > 0.05) between the segmented and the non-segmented PVM measurements [corrected]. Seg-9, which was the fastest among the three sequences, provided adequate spatial and temporal resolution (> 10 phases per cycle).
CONCLUSION: Segmented k-space PVM shows great clinical potential in blood flow quantification. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12500275     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  10 in total

1.  Effect of protocol choice on phase contrast cardiac magnetic resonance flow measurement in the ascending aorta: breath-hold and non-breath-hold.

Authors:  Michael A Bolen; Randolph M Setser; Ruvin S Gabriel; Rahul D Renapurkar; Yasmeen Tandon; Michael L Lieber; Milind Y Desai; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Accurate measurement of pulsatile flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler guidewire.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Yoshiaki Komori; Eiko Ueno; Yun Shen; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Munekuni Sato; Takeshi Okazaki; Ai Masukawa; Satoru Morita; Kazufumi Suzuki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Spatial factors for quantifying constant flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging and the intraluminal Doppler guidewire method.

Authors:  Haruhiko Machida; Yoshiaki Komori; Eiko Ueno; Yun Shen; Masami Hirata; Shinya Kojima; Satoru Morita; Munekuni Sato; Takeshi Okazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by MR: why, how and when.

Authors:  Ricardo Duarte; Gabriel Fernandez
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-06-15

6.  Assessment of hemodynamic changes in the systemic and pulmonary arterial circulation in patients with cystic fibrosis using phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Sebastian Ley; Michael Puderbach; Christian Fink; Monika Eichinger; Christian Plathow; Susanne Teiner; Matthias Wiebel; Frank-Michael Müller; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Shared velocity encoding: a method to improve the temporal resolution of phase-contrast velocity measurements.

Authors:  Hung-Yu Lin; Jacob A Bender; Yu Ding; Yiu-Cho Chung; Alice M Hinton; Michael L Pennell; Kevin K Whitehead; Subha V Raman; Orlando P Simonetti
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived right ventricular outflow tract systolic flow acceleration: a novel index of right ventricular function and prognosis in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Ki-Woon Kang; Hyuk-Jae Chang; Yeon Pyo Yoo; Hyeon Soo Yoon; Young-Jin Kim; Byoung-Wook Choi; Chi-Young Shim; Jongwon Ha; Namsik Chung
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 9.  Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of diastolic dysfunction in acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Shah M Azarisman; Karen S Teo; Matthew I Worthley; Stephen G Worthley
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  On the optimal temporal resolution for phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: establishment of baseline values.

Authors:  Francesco Santini; Michele Pansini; Maja Hrabak-Paar; Denise Yates; Thomas H Langenickel; Jens Bremerich; Oliver Bieri; Tilman Schubert
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 5.364

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.