Literature DB >> 15141672

[Pro- and supination impairments due to torsional deformities of the radial diaphysis before and after ulna osteotomy].

P Kasten1, M Krefft, S Schneider, J Hesselbach, A-M Weinberg.   

Abstract

The aim of this experimental study was to measure the exact influence of torsional deformities at the middle third of the radial shaft before and after osteotomy of the ulnar shaft on the rotation of the forearm. Intact and fresh cadaver specimens were fixed in a newly developed apparatus that allowed free pronation and supination. A ring fixator was applied to the radial shaft with K wires that allowed torsional deformities to be stabilized in steps of 10 degrees. The middle of the radial shaft was osteotomized via a small soft tissue window leaving the other soft tissues including the interosseous membrane intact. Supination and pronation were measured using a goniometer in a standardized fashion. The mean supination value before osteotomy of the radius was 71.6 degrees [standard deviation (SD)15.2 degrees], the mean pronation value was 64.5 degrees (SD 12.4 degrees). Radial osteotomy caused no significant difference in the range of motion prior to creation of torsional deformities. Supination torsional deformities greater than 30 degrees showed a significant loss of pronation and pronation torsional deformities greater than 30 degrees resulted in a significant loss of supination in 14 fresh cadavers, respectively. The amount of mean rotational loss was approximately the same in the respective pronation and supination torsional deformities. In the next step the influence of an ulna osteotomy on the range of motion was evaluated in different torsional deformities. In the four cadavers measured, there was an increase of the range of motion in the direction of the torsional deformity. These values were not significant when compared to values before ulna osteotomy, but there were significant changes to the non deformity (p=0.004 for pronation, p=0.003 for supination). Impairment of range of motion in the opposite direction of the deformity showed a similar appearance as values before ulna osteotomy. Again, there were significant changes to the non deformity (p=0.003 for pronation, p=0.005 for supination).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15141672     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-003-0544-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  16 in total

1.  A new kinematic model of pro- and supination of the human forearm.

Authors:  A M Weinberg; I T Pietsch; M B Helm; J Hesselbach; H Tscherne
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  [Pronation and supination of the forearm. With special reference to the humero-ulnar articulation].

Authors:  A M Weinberg; I T Pietsch; M Krefft; H C Pape; M van Griensven; M B Helm; H Reilmann; H Tscherne
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Roentgen diagnosis of post-traumatic radius torsion].

Authors:  H Bade
Journal:  Aktuelle Traumatol       Date:  1992-10

4.  Fractures of the radius and ulna.

Authors:  E M EVANS
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1951-11

5.  Quantification of the radial torsion angle with computerized tomography in cadaver specimens.

Authors:  R R Bindra; R J Cole; K Yamaguchi; B A Evanoff; T K Pilgram; L A Gilula; R H Gelberman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Malunited forearm fractures in children.

Authors:  C T Price; D S Scott; M E Kurzner; J C Flynn
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Analyzing forearm fractures in children. The more subtle signs of impending problems.

Authors:  C Creasman; D J Zaleske; M G Ehrlich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The effects of angular and rotational deformities of both bones of the forearm. An in vitro study.

Authors:  R R Tarr; A I Garfinkel; A Sarmiento
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  How does torsional deformity of the radial shaft influence the rotation of the forearm? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Philip Kasten; Mathias Krefft; Jürgen Hesselbach; Annelie M Weinberg
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  A biomechanical comparison of two methods of fixation of fractures of the forearm.

Authors:  D J Jones; M B Henley; E H Schemitsch; A F Tencer
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  1 in total

1.  Correction of forearm malunion guided by the preoperative complaint.

Authors:  Ladislav Nagy; Linas Jankauskas; Charles E Dumont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.