OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of orthognathic surgery on acoustic nasalance of subjects with cleft and investigate the causes of possible changes by analyzing velopharyngeal function and nasal patency. DESIGN/PATIENTS: Nasalance was measured in 29 subjects with operated cleft palate +/- lip before (PRE) and 45 days (POST1) and 9 months (POST2) after surgery, on average. In 19 of the patients, the minimum velopharyngeal (VP) and nasal cross-sectional (N) areas were also determined. INTERVENTIONS: Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary advancement in combination with procedures involving the nose, maxilla, mandible or all three. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nasalance, VP area, N area. RESULTS: We observed: (1) a significant (p < .05) increase in mean nasalance at POST1 and POST2, compared with PRE during the reading of oral sentences and nasal sentences; at POST2, high nasalance on the oral sentences was observed in 45% of the patients with normal nasalance at PRE, and 57% of patients with low nasalance on the nasal sentences at PRE no longer presented abnormal nasalance; (2) a significant increase in mean VP area at POST1; two borderline patients demonstrated deterioration of VP closure at POST2, compared with PRE; and (3) a significant increase in mean N area at POST2, with 73% of patients no longer presenting subnormal areas seen at PRE. CONCLUSIONS: On a long-term basis, orthognathic surgery modifies speech nasalance of some subjects with cleft, perhaps because of an increase in internal nose size. This may also improve nasal patency for breathing.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of orthognathic surgery on acoustic nasalance of subjects with cleft and investigate the causes of possible changes by analyzing velopharyngeal function and nasal patency. DESIGN/PATIENTS: Nasalance was measured in 29 subjects with operated cleft palate +/- lip before (PRE) and 45 days (POST1) and 9 months (POST2) after surgery, on average. In 19 of the patients, the minimum velopharyngeal (VP) and nasal cross-sectional (N) areas were also determined. INTERVENTIONS: Le Fort I osteotomy with maxillary advancement in combination with procedures involving the nose, maxilla, mandible or all three. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nasalance, VP area, N area. RESULTS: We observed: (1) a significant (p < .05) increase in mean nasalance at POST1 and POST2, compared with PRE during the reading of oral sentences and nasal sentences; at POST2, high nasalance on the oral sentences was observed in 45% of the patients with normal nasalance at PRE, and 57% of patients with low nasalance on the nasal sentences at PRE no longer presented abnormal nasalance; (2) a significant increase in mean VP area at POST1; two borderline patients demonstrated deterioration of VP closure at POST2, compared with PRE; and (3) a significant increase in mean N area at POST2, with 73% of patients no longer presenting subnormal areas seen at PRE. CONCLUSIONS: On a long-term basis, orthognathic surgery modifies speech nasalance of some subjects with cleft, perhaps because of an increase in internal nose size. This may also improve nasal patency for breathing.
Authors: Joy M K Tsang; Wilson S Yu; Jyrki Tuomainen; Debbie Sell; Kathy Y S Lee; Michael C F Tong; Valerie J Pereira Journal: Folia Phoniatr Logop Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 1.391