Literature DB >> 22783526

Perceptual speech assessment after maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with a repaired cleft lip and palate.

Seok-Kwun Kim1, Ju-Chan Kim, Ju-Bong Moon, Keun-Cheol Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Maxillary hypoplasia refers to a deficiency in the growth of the maxilla commonly seen in patients with a repaired cleft palate. Those who develop maxillary hypoplasia can be offered a repositioning of the maxilla to a functional and esthetic position. Velopharyngeal dysfunction is one of the important problems affecting speech after maxillary advancement surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of maxillary advancement on repaired cleft palate patients without preoperative deterioration in speech compared with non-cleft palate patients.
METHODS: Eighteen patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy between 2005 and 2011. One patient was excluded due to preoperative deterioration in speech. Eight repaired cleft palate patients belonged to group A, and 9 non-cleft palate patients belonged to group B. Speech assessments were performed preoperatively and postoperatively by using a speech screening protocol that consisted of a list of single words designed by Ok-Ran Jung. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine if there were significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative outcomes in each group A and B. And Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine if there were significant differences in the change of score between groups A and B.
RESULTS: No patients had any noticeable change in speech production on perceptual assessment after maxillary advancement in our study. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between groups A and B.
CONCLUSIONS: Repaired cleft palate patients without preoperative velopharyngeal dysfunction would not have greater risk of deterioration of velopharyngeal function after maxillary advancement compared to non-cleft palate patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Le Fort osteotomy; Speech; Velopharyngeal insufficiency

Year:  2012        PMID: 22783526      PMCID: PMC3385337          DOI: 10.5999/aps.2012.39.3.198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Plast Surg        ISSN: 2234-6163


  15 in total

1.  'OBJECTIVE' MEASURES OF NASALITY.

Authors:  K L MOLL
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1964-07

2.  The impact of maxillary osteotomy on speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate: an evidence-based approach to evaluating the literature.

Authors:  Valerie Pereira; Debbie Sell; Jyrki Tuomainen
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-11-21

Review 3.  The effect of cranio-maxillofacial osteotomies and distraction osteogenesis on speech and velopharyngeal status: a critical review.

Authors:  Nattharee Chanchareonsook; Nabil Samman; Tara L Whitehill
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2006-07

4.  Speech outcome and velopharyngeal function in cleft palate: comparison of Le Fort I maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis--early results.

Authors:  Nattharee Chanchareonsook; Tara L Whitehill; Nabil Samman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-01

5.  Velopharyngeal anatomy and maxillary advancement.

Authors:  S A Schendel; M Oeschlaeger; L M Wolford; B N Epker
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1979-05

6.  Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft palate orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  John H Phillips; Paula Klaiman; Raylene Delorey; David Blair MacDonald
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  A pilot study of the effects of transpalatal maxillary advancement on velopharyngeal closure in cleft palate patients.

Authors:  Debbie Sell; Lian Ma; David James; Michael Mars; Martyn Sheriff
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Predictors of velopharyngeal insufficiency after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with cleft palate.

Authors:  Ryan W McComb; Eileen M Marrinan; Roger C Nuss; Richard A Labrie; John B Mulliken; Bonnie L Padwa
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function.

Authors:  H D P Chua; T L Whitehill; N Samman; L K Cheung
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 2.789

10.  Effects of orthognathic surgery on speech and breathing of subjects with cleft lip and palate: acoustic and aerodynamic assessment.

Authors:  Inge E K Trindade; Renata P Yamashita; Roberto M Suguimoto; Reinaldo Mazzottini; Alceu S Trindade
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2003-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.