| Literature DB >> 28979573 |
Abdel Rahim M Bibars1, Firas S D Alfwaress2, Abed Al-Hadi Hamasha3, Zeid A Al-Hourani1, Khader Almhdawi2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypernasality is a frequently encountered problem in the speech of individuals with velopharyngeal incompetence. The use of palatal lift appliance (PLA) is the main treatment option for correction of velopharyngeal incompetence. The literature on the outcomes of using prosthetics treatment for Arabic speaking patients is scarce.Entities:
Keywords: Palatal lift prosthesis; Prosthodontic rehabilitation; Velopharyngeal impairment; Velopharyngeal incompetence; Velopharyngeal insufficiency PLA; Velopharyngeal valve
Year: 2017 PMID: 28979573 PMCID: PMC5611712 DOI: 10.2174/1874210601711010436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Dent J ISSN: 1874-2106
Distribution of the demographics of participants.
| Participant | Age | Gender | Diagnosis | Pre-existing Prosthesis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61 | M | ALS | Yes |
| 2 | 31 | M | TBI | No |
| 3 | 33 | M | CVA | No |
| 4 | 9 | F | TBI | No |
| 5 | 51 | M | CVA | No |
| 6 | 49 | F | MS | No |
Distribution of the individual with their mean nasalance scores (%) for the syllable repetition and vowel prolongation tasks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 22 | 22 | 42 | 33 | 18 | 30.8 (12.2) | Hypernasal | 0.008* | |
| 26 | 5 | 17 | 30 | 21 | 14 | 18.8 (7.9) | Normal resonance | ||
| 57 | 37 | 31 | 42 | 27 | 33 | 37.8 (11.8) | Hypernasal | 0.003* | |
| 34 | 20 | 23 | 32 | 18 | 23 | 25 (6.2) | Normal resonance | ||
| 68 | 66 | 57 | 45 | 68 | 58 | 60.3 (5.5) | Hypernasal | 0.008* | |
| 38 | 50 | 39 | 27 | 23 | 49 | 37.6 (10.9) | Hypernasal | ||
| 69 | 89 | 82 | 47 | 75 | 85 | 74.5 (8) | Hypernasal | 0.028* | |
| 42 | 75 | 61 | 40 | 25 | 80 | 53.8 (23) | Hypernasal | ||
| 27 | 12 | 19 | 20 | 12 | 50 | 23.3 (15.8) | Normal resonance | 0.007* | |
| 22 | 3 | 14 | 14 | 9 | 36 | 16.3 (12.8) | Normal resonance | ||
| 32 | 31 | 56 | 38 | 19 | 78 | 42.3 (23.6) | Hypernasal | 0.008* | |
| 22 | 22 | 33 | 27 | 12 | 51 | 27.8 (14.9) | Normal resonance | ||
| 24 | 15 | 17 | 22 | 23 | 61 | 27 (18.8) | Normal resonance | 0.056 | |
| 19 | 7 | 12 | 16 | 17 | 31 | 17 (9) | Normal resonance | ||
| 94 | 97 | 93 | 94 | 94 | 97 | 94.8 (1.9) | Nasal consonant | 0.419 | |
| 92 | 95 | 94 | 97 | 92 | 94 | 94 (1.3) | Nasal consonant |
* significant.
Perceptual speech ratings for the six patients with and without palatal lift appliance (PLA).
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 1 | Trial 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Trial 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | Trial 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Trial 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 3 | Trial 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Trial 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | |
| 4 | Trial 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Trial 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 5 | Trial 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| Trial 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | |
| 6 | Trial 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Trial 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 4 | |
Absence of hypernasality (1), mild hypernasality (2), moderate hypernasality (3), and severe hypernasality (4).