Literature DB >> 12495242

Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?

Suzete Chiviacowsky1, Gabriele Wulf.   

Abstract

This paper examines whether self-controlled feedback schedules enhance learning, because they are more tailored to the performers' needs than externally controlled feedback schedules. Participants practiced a sequential timing task. One group of learners (self-control) was provided with feedback whenever they requested it, whereas another group (yoked) had no influence on the feedback schedule. The self-control group showed learning benefits on a delayed transfer test. Questionnaire results revealed that self-control learners asked for feedback primarily after good trials and yoked learners preferred to receive feedback after good trials. Analyses demonstrated that errors were lower on feedback than no-feedback trials for the self-control group but not for the yoked group. Thus, self-control participants appeared to use a strategy for requesting feedback. This might explain learning advantages of self-controlled practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12495242     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  33 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  Self-directed practice schedule enhances learning of suturing skills.

Authors:  Oleg Safir; Camille K Williams; Adam Dubrowski; David Backstein; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Feedback and intention during motor-skill learning: a connection with prospective memory.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Yannick Blandin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-07-19

Review 5.  A taxonomy of voice therapy.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Nelson Roy; Shaheen Awan; Joseph Stemple; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning.

Authors:  Rebecca Lewthwaite; Suzete Chiviacowsky; Ricardo Drews; Gabriele Wulf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

7.  Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review.

Authors:  Roland Sigrist; Georg Rauter; Robert Riener; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-02

9.  An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-18

10.  Relatedness support enhances motor learning.

Authors:  Daniela H Gonzalez; Suzete Chiviacowsky
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.