| Literature DB >> 12495242 |
Suzete Chiviacowsky1, Gabriele Wulf.
Abstract
This paper examines whether self-controlled feedback schedules enhance learning, because they are more tailored to the performers' needs than externally controlled feedback schedules. Participants practiced a sequential timing task. One group of learners (self-control) was provided with feedback whenever they requested it, whereas another group (yoked) had no influence on the feedback schedule. The self-control group showed learning benefits on a delayed transfer test. Questionnaire results revealed that self-control learners asked for feedback primarily after good trials and yoked learners preferred to receive feedback after good trials. Analyses demonstrated that errors were lower on feedback than no-feedback trials for the self-control group but not for the yoked group. Thus, self-control participants appeared to use a strategy for requesting feedback. This might explain learning advantages of self-controlled practice.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12495242 DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2002.10609040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Q Exerc Sport ISSN: 0270-1367 Impact factor: 2.500