Literature DB >> 12494429

Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: long-term psychological effects.

Ann-Marie Codori1, Kristin L Zawacki, Gloria M Petersen, Diana L Miglioretti, Judith A Bacon, Jill D Trimbath, Susan V Booker, Kimberly Picarello, Francis M Giardiello.   

Abstract

Children who carry a gene mutation for familial adenomatous polyposis are virtually certain to develop colorectal cancer without annual endoscopic screening and a colectomy when polyps appear. Predictive genetic testing can identify children who need regular surveillance. While the medical benefits of genetic testing are clear, the psychological effects have not been well studied. We evaluated the long-term psychological effects of genetic testing in 48 children and their parents. In each family, one parent was a known APC gene mutation carrier. Before genetic testing, and three times afterward, participants completed measures of psychological functioning, which, for children, included depression and anxiety symptoms, and behavior problems and competencies. Parents completed a measure of depression symptoms. Data were collected at 3-, 12-, and 23-55 months after disclosure. Twenty-two children tested positive; 26 children tested negative. Mean length of follow-up was 38 months. There were no clinically significant changes in mean psychological test scores in children or parents, regardless of the children's test results or the sex of the affected parent. However, the group of children who tested positive and had a mutation-positive sibling showed significant, but subclinical, increases in depression symptoms. Furthermore, several individual mutation-negative children with a positive sibling had clinical elevations in anxiety symptoms at one or more follow-up. Behavior problems declined for all groups, and behavior competence scores remained unchanged. We conclude that most children do not suffer clinically significant psychological distress after testing. However, because some children showed clinically significant anxiety symptoms, long-term psychological support should be available to those families with both mutation-positive and mutation-negative children, and with multiple mutation-positive children. Our findings should call for a multidisciplinary approach to genetic testing for children. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12494429     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.10926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  30 in total

1.  A qualitative study exploring genetic counsellors' experiences of counselling children.

Authors:  Fiona Ulph; James Leong; Cris Glazebrook; Ellen Townsend
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 2.  Methodology in longitudinal studies on psychological effects of predictive DNA testing: a review.

Authors:  R Timman; T Stijnen; A Tibben
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Research issues in genetic testing of adolescents for obesity.

Authors:  Mary E Segal; Pamela Sankar; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Predictive testing of eighteen year olds: counseling challenges.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Elly Lynch; Lesley Spencer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Psychosocial impact of familial adenomatous polyposis on young adults: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Shab Mireskandari; Jennifer Sangster; Bettina Meiser; Belinda Thewes; Claire Groombridge; Allan Spigelman; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: background considerations towards ESHG Recommendations.

Authors:  Pascal Borry; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Martina C Cornel; Angus Clarke; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  The challenge of developmentally appropriate care: predictive genetic testing in young people for familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Rony E Duncan; Lynn Gillam; Julian Savulescu; Robert Williamson; John G Rogers; Martin B Delatycki
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the impact of genetic testing on self-concept in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; N Stuckless; S Gallinger; M Aronson; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; J Stokes; C Way; J Green; K Butler; H V Petersen; J Wong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: a qualitative study of the BRCA-negative experience.

Authors:  Alexis D Bakos; Sadie P Hutson; Jennifer T Loud; June A Peters; Ruthann M Giusti; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.