Literature DB >> 12488415

The Minneapolis-Manchester Quality of Life instrument: reliability and validity of the Adolescent Form.

Smita Bhatia1, Meriel E M Jenney, Monica K Bogue, Todd H Rockwood, James H Feusner, Debra L Friedman, Leslie L Robison, Robert L Kane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: With improvement in survival after childhood cancer, increasing emphasis is being placed on the impact of treatment and its sequelae on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of survivors. The Minneapolis-Manchester Quality of Life Instrument (MMQL) is a standardized patient self-report instrument designed to assess HRQL in survivors of childhood cancer. The MMQL is being developed for three age groups to address the changing developmental need of different ages: MMQL-Youth (8 to 12 years), MMQL-Adolescent (13 to 20 years), and MMQL-Young Adult (21 to 45 years). This report focuses on the development and testing of the MMQL-Adolescent Form. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To validate the instrument, the MMQL-Adolescent Form was administered to 397 adolescents (129 healthy individuals, 110 patients with cancer undergoing therapy, and 158 subjects off therapy for cancer). Factor analysis was conducted to refine the instrument. Construct validity was conducted by comparing similar constructs in the MMQL-Adolescent Form and the Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ). Discriminate validity was determined by comparing healthy children with children with cancer either on or off therapy. Stability of the MMQL was tested by readministering the MMQL-Adolescent Form 2 weeks later.
RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability was in the acceptable range for this instrument. The MMQL was able to discriminate between the three study populations. There were high correlations between the MMQL scales and similar CHQ domains. Test-retest reliability of the MMQL-Adolescent Form demonstrated that the instrument was extremely stable in all scales tested.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the data provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the MMQL-Adolescent Form as a comprehensive, multidimensional self-report instrument for measuring HRQL among adolescent survivors of childhood cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12488415     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2002.05.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  34 in total

1.  The Minneapolis-Manchester Quality of Life Instrument: reliability and validity of the Adult Form in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Alysia Bosworth; Elizabeth L Goodman; Eric Wu; Liton Francisco; Leslie L Robison; Smita Bhatia
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory ™ generic core scales, cancer module, and multidimensional fatigue scale in long-term adult survivors of pediatric cancer.

Authors:  Rhonda S Robert; Raheem J Paxton; Shana L Palla; Grace Yang; Martha A Askins; Shaini E Joy; Joann L Ater
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Child Health Ratings Inventory (CHRIs) and Disease-Specific Impairment Inventory-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (DSII-HSCT) in parents and children.

Authors:  S K Parsons; M C Shih; D K Mayer; S E Barlow; S E Supran; S L Levy; S Greenfield; S H Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Health status and QOL instruments used in childhood cancer research: deciphering conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions.

Authors:  Nora Fayed; Vero Schiariti; Cristina Bostan; Alarcos Cieza; Anne Klassen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Measuring the psychosocial health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a critical review.

Authors:  Tara Clinton-McHarg; Mariko Carey; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Anthony Shakeshaft; Kathy Rainbird
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Optimizing the measurement of health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  John M Salsman; Suzanne C Danhauer; Justin B Moore; Mollie R Canzona; David E Victorson; Bradley J Zebrack; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Measuring quality of life.

Authors:  Christine Eiser; Meriel Jenney
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 8.  Child and adolescent self-report symptom measurement in pediatric oncology research: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Laura C Pinheiro; Molly McFatrich; Nicole Lucas; Jennifer S Walker; Janice S Withycombe; Pamela S Hinds; Lillian Sung; Deborah Tomlinson; David R Freyer; Jennifer W Mack; Justin N Baker; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Cancer (IOC-CS) scale for young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Brad J Zebrack; Janet E Donohue; James G Gurney; Mark A Chesler; Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 10.  Quality of life questionnaires for children with cancer and childhood cancer survivors: a review of the development of available measures.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Sonya J Strohm; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.