Literature DB >> 12486174

Isolation of relevant visual features from random stimuli for cortical complex cells.

Jon Touryan1, Brian Lau, Yang Dan.   

Abstract

A crucial step in understanding the function of a neural circuit in visual processing is to know what stimulus features are represented in the spiking activity of the neurons. For neurons with complex, nonlinear response properties, characterization of feature representation requires measurement of their responses to a large ensemble of visual stimuli and an analysis technique that allows identification of relevant features in the stimuli. In the present study, we recorded the responses of complex cells in the primary visual cortex of the cat to spatiotemporal random-bar stimuli and applied spike-triggered correlation analysis of the stimulus ensemble. For each complex cell, we were able to isolate a small number of relevant features from a large number of null features in the random-bar stimuli. Using these features as visual stimuli, we found that each relevant feature excited the neuron effectively in isolation and contributed to the response additively when combined with other features. In contrast, the null features evoked little or no response in isolation and divisively suppressed the responses to relevant features. Thus, for each cortical complex cell, visual inputs can be decomposed into two distinct types of features (relevant and null), and additive and divisive interactions between these features may constitute the basic operations in visual cortical processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12486174      PMCID: PMC6758424     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  66 in total

1.  Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Mapping receptive fields in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-05-21       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.

Authors:  Stephen V David; William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Local sensitivity to stimulus orientation and spatial frequency within the receptive fields of neurons in visual area 2 of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  X Tao; B Zhang; E L Smith; S Nishimoto; I Ohzawa; Y M Chino
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Authors:  Deepankar Mohanty; Benjamin Scholl; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Receptive field dimensionality increases from the auditory midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Characterizing responses of translation-invariant neurons to natural stimuli: maximally informative invariant dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Eickenberg; Ryan J Rowekamp; Minjoon Kouh; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

8.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Rafael Malach; David J Heeger
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Rapid synaptic depression explains nonlinear modulation of spectro-temporal tuning in primary auditory cortex by natural stimuli.

Authors:  Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Velocity computation in the primate visual system.

Authors:  David C Bradley; Manu S Goyal
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.