Literature DB >> 12481228

Workflow optimization: current trends and future directions.

Bruce Reiner1, Eliot Siegel, John A Carrino.   

Abstract

In an attempt to maximize productivity within the medical imaging department, increasing importance and attention is being placed on workflow. Workflow is the process of analyzing individual steps that occur during a single event, such as the performance of an MRI exam. The primary focus of workflow optimization within the imaging department is automation and task consolidation, however, a number of other factors should be considered including the stochastic nature of the workload, availability of human resources, and the specific technologies being employed. The purpose of this paper is to determine the complex relationship that exists between information technology and the radiologic technologist, in an attempt to determine how workflow can be optimized to improve technologist productivity. This relationship takes on greater importance as more imaging departments are undergoing the transition from film-based to filmless operation. A nationwide survey was conducted to compare technologist workflow in film-based and filmless operations, for all imaging modalities. The individual tasks performed by technologists were defined, along with the amount of time allocated to these tasks. The index of workflow efficiency was determined to be the percentage of overall technologist time allocated to image acquisition, since this is the primary responsibility of the radiologic technologist. Preliminary analysis indicates technologist workflow in filmless operation is enhanced when compared with film-based operation, for all imaging modalities. The specific tasks that require less technologist time in filmless operation are accessing data and retake rates (due to both technical factors and lost exams). Surprisingly, no significant differences were reported for the task of image processing, when comparing technologist workflow in film-based and filmless operations. Additional research is planned to evaluate the potential workflow gains achievable through workflow optimization software, improved systems integration, and automation of advanced image processing techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12481228      PMCID: PMC3613260          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-0022-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  15 in total

1.  Chairman's editorial: Control Alt Delete.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Application of innovation economics to medical imaging and information systems technologies.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Matthew McKinley
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kim M Unertl; Laurie L Novak; Kevin B Johnson; Nancy M Lorenzi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Analyzing PACS Usage Patterns by Means of Process Mining: Steps Toward a More Detailed Workflow Analysis in Radiology.

Authors:  Daniel Forsberg; Beverly Rosipko; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Impact of PACS on dictation turnaround time and productivity.

Authors:  Luigi Lepanto; Guy Paré; David Aubry; Pierre Robillard; Jacques Lesage
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Analysis of the X-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS system.

Authors:  Caterina Mariani; Antonella Tronchi; Luigi Oncini; Osvaldo Pirani; Roberto Murri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Introducing PACS to the late majority. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Petter Hurlen; Truls Østbye; Arne Borthne; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  A General Framework for Monitoring Image Acquisition Workflow in the Radiology Environment: Timeliness for Acute Stroke CT Imaging.

Authors:  Timothy P Szczykutowicz; Christina L Brunnquell; Gregory D Avey; Carrie Bartels; Daryn S Belden; Richard J Bruce; Aaron S Field; Walter W Peppler; Peter Wasmund; Gary Wendt
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Improved Screening Mammogram Workflow by Maximizing PACS Streamlining Capabilities in an Academic Breast Center.

Authors:  Ramya Pham; Daniel Forsberg; Donna Plecha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Centralized Clinical Trial Imaging Data Management: Practical Guidance from a Comprehensive Cancer Center's Experience.

Authors:  Brandon Lee; A Abbott; S Davidson; L Syrkin; G LeFever; A D Van den Abbeele
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.