Literature DB >> 26353749

Analyzing PACS Usage Patterns by Means of Process Mining: Steps Toward a More Detailed Workflow Analysis in Radiology.

Daniel Forsberg1,2, Beverly Rosipko3, Jeffrey L Sunshine3.   

Abstract

In this paper, statistical analysis and techniques from process mining are employed to analyze interaction patterns originating from radiologists reading medical images in a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Event logs from 1 week of data, corresponding to 567 cases of single-view chest radiographs read by 14 radiologists, were analyzed. Statistical analysis showed that the numbers of commands and command types used by the radiologists per case only have a slightly positive correlation with the time to read a case (0.31 and 0.55, respectively). Further, one way ANOVA showed that the factors time of day, radiologist and specialty were significant for the number of commands per case, whereas radiologist was also significant for the number of command types, but with no significance of any of the factors on time to read. Applying process mining to the event logs of all users showed that a seemingly "simple" examination (single-view chest radiographs) can be associated with a highly complex interaction process. However, repeating the process discovery on each individual radiologist revealed that the initially discovered complex interaction process consists of one group of radiologists with individually well-structured interaction processes and a second smaller group of users with progressively more complex usage patterns. Future research will focus on metrics to describe derived interaction processes in order to investigate if one set of interaction patterns can be considered as more efficient than another set when reading radiological images in a PACS.

Keywords:  Chest radiographs; Data mining; Efficiency; PACS; Productivity; Workflow

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26353749      PMCID: PMC4722035          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-015-9824-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  Functional requirements of a desktop clinical image display application.

Authors:  B J Erickson; W J Ryan; D G Gehring
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Workflow optimization: current trends and future directions.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner; Eliot Siegel; John A Carrino
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Radiology interpretation process modeling.

Authors:  Rita Noumeir
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Saving time, improving satisfaction: the impact of a digital radiology system on physician workflow and system efficiency.

Authors:  Malathi Srinivasan; Eric Liederman; Noralyn Baluyot; Robert Jacoby
Journal:  J Healthc Inf Manag       Date:  2006

5.  Analysis of the X-ray work flow in two diagnostic imaging departments with and without a RIS/PACS system.

Authors:  Caterina Mariani; Antonella Tronchi; Luigi Oncini; Osvaldo Pirani; Roberto Murri
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Automating radiologist workflow, part 2: hands-free navigation.

Authors:  Bruce Reiner
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Analyzing the differential impact of radiology information systems across radiology modalities.

Authors:  Atanu Lahiri; Abraham Seidmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Clinician usage patterns of a desktop radiology information display application.

Authors:  B J Erickson; W J Ryan; D G Gehring; C Beebe
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Radiology workflow and patient volume: effect of picture archiving and communication systems on technologists and radiologists.

Authors:  R O Redfern; S C Horii; E Feingold; H L Kundel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  A filmless radiology department in a full digital regional hospital: quantitative evaluation of the increased quality and efficiency.

Authors:  Andrea Nitrosi; Giovanni Borasi; Franco Nicoli; Gino Modigliani; Andrea Botti; Marco Bertolini; Pietro Notari
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.056

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors Affecting Radiologist's PACS Usage.

Authors:  Daniel Forsberg; Beverly Rosipko; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Implementation and Validation of PACS Integrated Peer Review for Discrepancy Recording of Radiology Reporting.

Authors:  A W Olthof; P M A van Ooijen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.460

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.