Literature DB >> 8861837

Breast cancer survivors: psychosocial concerns and quality of life.

P A Ganz1, A Coscarelli, C Fred, B Kahn, M L Polinsky, L Petersen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the psychosocial concerns and quality of life of breast cancer survivors evaluated 2 and 3 years after primary treatment.
METHODS: A sample of 139 breast cancer survivors who had been interviewed during the first year after primary treatment participated in a mailed survey at 2 years (N = 69) and 3 years (N = 70) after initial surgery. A random sample of these survivors were also interviewed in person. The mailed questionnaire included standardized instruments to assess quality of life (QL), rehabilitation needs, and psychological distress. Additional survey questions were developed to examine post-surgical recovery, employment and insurance problems, social support, and existential concerns. The in-person interviews expanded on these questions and systematically compared these patients' rehabilitation needs to those which existed at the time of an interview 1 year after surgery.
RESULTS: The 2 and 3 year participants in this follow-up study did not differ from each other on their prior assessments with standardized QL instruments during the first year after surgery, nor did they differ from the full study sample of 227 women. The scores on the Profile of Mood States and the Functional Living Index-Cancer were the same for the 2 and 3 year survivor groups and did not differ from the previous assessments at 1 year after initial treatment. The scores on the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System showed a significant decline in Global Quality of Life, Sexual Functioning and Marital Functioning between the 1 year and 3 year evaluations. For the 2 year sample only Sexual Functioning showed a deterioration between the 1 and 2 year evaluations. Using the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0, the breast cancer survivors were compared with patients from the Medical Outcomes Study. The breast cancer survivors demonstrated higher levels of functioning in many dimensions (role functioning, social functioning, pain, and general health) than the patients with chronic medical conditions. In spite of relatively good physical and emotional functioning on this generic measure of health status and quality of life, these breast cancer survivors reported a number of important and severe rehabilitation problems that persisted beyond one year after primary treatment. Especially frequent were problems associated with physical and recreational activities, body image, sexual interest, sexual function, and problems with dating for those who were single.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast cancer survivors appear to attain maximum recovery from the physical and psychological trauma of cancer treatment by one year after surgery. A number of aspects of QL and rehabilitation problems worsen after that time. Nevertheless, breast cancer survivors rate their QL more favorably than outpatients with other common medical conditions, and they identify many positive aspects from the cancer experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8861837     DOI: 10.1007/bf01806673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  24 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured?

Authors:  N K Aaronson
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.990

2.  Assessing problems of cancer patients: psychometric properties of the cancer inventory of problem situations.

Authors:  C A Schag; R L Heinrich; R L Aadland; P A Ganz
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Measuring quality of life: risks and benefits.

Authors:  H Schipper; M Levitt
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-10

4.  Functional status of long-term breast cancer survivors: demonstrating chronicity.

Authors:  M L Polinsky
Journal:  Health Soc Work       Date:  1994-08

5.  Methodology in behavioral and psychosocial cancer research. Conceptualizing disease impact and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery?

Authors:  P A Ganz; A C Schag; J J Lee; M L Polinsky; S J Tan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.

Authors:  H Schipper; J Clinch; A McMurray; M Levitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  The impact of breast cancer on sexuality, body image, and intimate relationships.

Authors:  L R Schover
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer.

Authors:  C A Schag; P A Ganz; M L Polinsky; C Fred; K Hirji; L Petersen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Physical and psychologic distress associated with adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  M T Knobf
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  107 in total

1.  Carrier testing of children for two X linked diseases in a family based setting: a retrospective long term psychosocial evaluation.

Authors:  O Järvinen; A M Aalto; A E Lehesjoki; M Lindlöf; I Söderling; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Information and support for women following the primary treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jane C A Raupach; Janet E Hiller
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 3.  Biobehavioral outcomes following psychological interventions for cancer patients.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2002-06

4.  Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Nancy K Janz; Mahasin Mujahid; Paula M Lantz; Angela Fagerlin; Barbara Salem; Monica Morrow; Dennis Deapen; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Psychological responses to cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Barbara L Andersen; Charles L Shapiro; William B Farrar; Timothy Crespin; Sharla Wells-Digregorio
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Older breast cancer survivors: geriatric assessment domains are associated with poor tolerance of treatment adverse effects and predict mortality over 7 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Andreas E Stuck; Soe Soe Thwin; Rebecca A Silliman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Perspectives of a lifelong cancer survivor--improving survivorship care.

Authors:  Ruth Rechis; Sarah R Arvey; Ellen Burke Beckjord
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine by patients with breast cancer: observations from a health-care survey.

Authors:  G Nagel; H Hoyer; D Katenkamp
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Patterns of confidant use among patients and spouses in the year after breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Maunsell; Stéphane Guay; Evelyne Yandoma; Michel Dorval; Sophie Lauzier; Louise Provencher; André Robidoux
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Sexual concerns in cancer patients: a comparison of GI and breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Rebecca A Shelby; Francis J Keefe; Laura S Porter; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.