PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the presence of dynamic foraminal stenosis using a new low-field dedicated magnetic resonance (MR) unit with a balancing system that allows images to be acquired both in the recumbent and upright position. Imaging of lumbar spine with the patient in a supine, nonweight-bearing position is likely to misrepresent the degree and potential risk of spinal stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period between September 2008 and May 2011, we selected 630 symptomatic patients aged 40-65 years (mean age 56) who underwent conventional MR in clinostatic position. The study only included selected patients (total 160) who underwent clinostatic and orthostatic evaluation using a dedicated MR system (G-scan). The biomechanical parameters were also considered. Changes in the dimension of the neural foramina were compared using the presence of disc and facet degeneration by statistical analysis. RESULTS: Stenosis of the intervertebral foramen was never found in the presence of normal intervertebral discs either in the presence or in the absence of facet disease, in either clinostatic or orthostatic position. Sixty-one stenotic levels were detected which were visualised exclusively in scans obtained under weight-bearing conditions. We named this dynamic condition "occult stenosis". In all of these cases, disc disease was associated with facet pathology. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the association between disc pathology and facet osteoarthrosis can cause occult foraminal stenosis. Strategies to image the spine under physiological load conditions may improve the clinical diagnosis of radicular pain.
PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the presence of dynamic foraminal stenosis using a new low-field dedicated magnetic resonance (MR) unit with a balancing system that allows images to be acquired both in the recumbent and upright position. Imaging of lumbar spine with the patient in a supine, nonweight-bearing position is likely to misrepresent the degree and potential risk of spinal stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the period between September 2008 and May 2011, we selected 630 symptomatic patients aged 40-65 years (mean age 56) who underwent conventional MR in clinostatic position. The study only included selected patients (total 160) who underwent clinostatic and orthostatic evaluation using a dedicated MR system (G-scan). The biomechanical parameters were also considered. Changes in the dimension of the neural foramina were compared using the presence of disc and facet degeneration by statistical analysis. RESULTS: Stenosis of the intervertebral foramen was never found in the presence of normal intervertebral discs either in the presence or in the absence of facet disease, in either clinostatic or orthostatic position. Sixty-one stenotic levels were detected which were visualised exclusively in scans obtained under weight-bearing conditions. We named this dynamic condition "occult stenosis". In all of these cases, disc disease was associated with facet pathology. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the association between disc pathology and facet osteoarthrosis can cause occult foraminal stenosis. Strategies to image the spine under physiological load conditions may improve the clinical diagnosis of radicular pain.
Authors: Lifeng Lao; Michael D Daubs; Shinji Takahashi; Elizabeth L Lord; Jeremiah R Cohen; Guibin Zhong; Jeffrey C Wang Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Carlo Masciocchi; Francesco Arrigoni; Fabiana Ferrari; Aldo Victor Giordano; Sonia Iafrate; Ilaria Capretti; Ester Cannizzaro; Alfonso Reginelli; Anna Maria Ierardi; Chiara Floridi; Alessio Salvatore Angileri; Luca Brunese; Antonio Barile Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: A Splendiani; F D'Orazio; L Patriarca; F Arrigoni; F Caranci; P Fonio; L Brunese; A Barile; E Di Cesare; C Masciocchi Journal: Musculoskelet Surg Date: 2017-02-06
Authors: Marco Perri; Giuseppe Grattacaso; Valeria di Tunno; Claudia Marsecano; Antonio Gennarelli; Giulia Michelini; Alessandra Splendiani; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi; Massimo Gallucci Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Bjarke B Hansen; Philip Hansen; Anders F Christensen; Charlotte Trampedach; Zoreh Rasti; Henning Bliddal; Mikael Boesen Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2017-08-15 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Federico Bruno; Fernando Smaldone; Marco Varrassi; Francesco Arrigoni; Antonio Barile; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi; Alessandra Splendiani Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2017-05-09 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Alessandra Splendiani; Marco Perri; Giuseppe Grattacaso; Valeria Di Tunno; Claudia Marsecano; Luca Panebianco; Antonio Gennarelli; Valentina Felli; Marco Varrassi; Antonio Barile; Ernesto Di Cesare; Carlo Masciocchi; Massimo Gallucci Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 3.469