OBJECTIVE: To clarify the practice of withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia in nursing homes. DESIGN: Qualitative, ethnographic study in two phases. SETTING: 10 wards in two nursing homes in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 35 patients with dementia, eight doctors, 43 nurses, and 32 families. RESULTS: The clinical course of dementia was considered normal and was rarely reason to begin the artificial administration of fluids and food in advanced disease. Fluids and food seemed to be given mainly when there was an acute illness or a condition that needed medical treatment and which required hydration to be effective. The medical condition of the patient, the wishes of the family, and the interpretations of the patients' quality of life by their care providers were considered more important than living wills and policy agreements. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors' decisions about withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia are influenced more by the clinical course of the illness, the presumed quality of life of the patient, and the patient's medical condition than they are by advanced planning of care. In an attempt to understand the wishes of the patient doctors try to create the broadest possible basis for the decision making process and its outcome, mainly by involving the family.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the practice of withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia in nursing homes. DESIGN: Qualitative, ethnographic study in two phases. SETTING: 10 wards in two nursing homes in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 35 patients with dementia, eight doctors, 43 nurses, and 32 families. RESULTS: The clinical course of dementia was considered normal and was rarely reason to begin the artificial administration of fluids and food in advanced disease. Fluids and food seemed to be given mainly when there was an acute illness or a condition that needed medical treatment and which required hydration to be effective. The medical condition of the patient, the wishes of the family, and the interpretations of the patients' quality of life by their care providers were considered more important than living wills and policy agreements. CONCLUSIONS: Doctors' decisions about withholding the artificial administration of fluids and food from elderly patients with dementia are influenced more by the clinical course of the illness, the presumed quality of life of the patient, and the patient's medical condition than they are by advanced planning of care. In an attempt to understand the wishes of the patient doctors try to create the broadest possible basis for the decision making process and its outcome, mainly by involving the family.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach
Authors: Margaret R Helton; Jenny T van der Steen; Timothy P Daaleman; George R Gamble; Miel W Ribbe Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Mirjam C van Soest-Poortvliet; Jenny T van der Steen; Henrica C W de Vet; Cees M P M Hertogh; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Luc H J Deliens Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Shelley A Sternberg; Shiri Shinan-Altman; Ladislav Volicer; David J Casarett; Jenny T van der Steen Journal: Geriatrics (Basel) Date: 2021-04-22
Authors: Richard Philip Lee; Claire Bamford; Marie Poole; Emma McLellan; Catherine Exley; Louise Robinson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 3.240