PURPOSE: We wanted to explore factors that influence Dutch and US physician treatment decisions when nursing home patients with dementia become acutely ill with pneumonia. METHODS: Using a qualitative semistructured interview study design, we collected data from 12 physicians in the Netherlands and 12 physicians in North Carolina who care for nursing home patients. Our main outcome measures were perceptions of influential factors that determine physician treatment decisions regarding care of demented patients who develop pneumonia. RESULTS: Several themes emerged from the study. First, physicians viewed their patient care roles differently. Dutch physicians assumed active, primary responsibility for treatment decisions, whereas US physicians were more passive and deferential to family preferences, even in cases when they considered families' wishes for care as inappropriate. These family wishes were a second theme. US physicians reported a perceived sense of threat from families as influencing the decision to treat more aggressively, whereas Dutch physicians revealed a predisposition to treat based on what they perceived was in the best interest of the patient. The third theme was the process of decision making whereby Dutch physicians based decisions on an intimate knowledge of the patient, and American physicians reported limited knowledge of their nursing home patients as a result of lack of contact time. CONCLUSION: Physician-perceived care roles regarding treatment decisions are influenced by contextual differences in physician training and health care delivery in the United States and the Netherlands. These results are relevant to the debate about optimal care for patients with poor quality of life who lack decision-making capacity.
PURPOSE: We wanted to explore factors that influence Dutch and US physician treatment decisions when nursing home patients with dementia become acutely ill with pneumonia. METHODS: Using a qualitative semistructured interview study design, we collected data from 12 physicians in the Netherlands and 12 physicians in North Carolina who care for nursing home patients. Our main outcome measures were perceptions of influential factors that determine physician treatment decisions regarding care of demented patients who develop pneumonia. RESULTS: Several themes emerged from the study. First, physicians viewed their patient care roles differently. Dutch physicians assumed active, primary responsibility for treatment decisions, whereas US physicians were more passive and deferential to family preferences, even in cases when they considered families' wishes for care as inappropriate. These family wishes were a second theme. US physicians reported a perceived sense of threat from families as influencing the decision to treat more aggressively, whereas Dutch physicians revealed a predisposition to treat based on what they perceived was in the best interest of the patient. The third theme was the process of decision making whereby Dutch physicians based decisions on an intimate knowledge of the patient, and American physicians reported limited knowledge of their nursing home patients as a result of lack of contact time. CONCLUSION: Physician-perceived care roles regarding treatment decisions are influenced by contextual differences in physician training and health care delivery in the United States and the Netherlands. These results are relevant to the debate about optimal care for patients with poor quality of life who lack decision-making capacity.
Authors: Robin L Kruse; David R Mehr; Keith E Boles; Judith R Lave; Ellen F Binder; Richard Madsen; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jenny T van der Steen; Gerrit van der Wal; David R Mehr; Marcel E Ooms; Miel W Ribbe Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2005 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Kenneth S Boockvar; Ann L Gruber-Baldini; Lynda Burton; Sheryl Zimmerman; Conrad May; Jay Magaziner Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Tessa van der Maaden; Simone A Hendriks; Henrica C W de Vet; Menno T Zomerhuis; Martin Smalbrugge; Elise P Jansma; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Cees M P M Hertogh; Jenny T van der Steen Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Jenny T van der Steen; Patricia Lane; Neil W Kowall; Dirk L Knol; Ladislav Volicer Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2010-10-08 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Mirjam C van Soest-Poortvliet; Jenny T van der Steen; Henrica C W de Vet; Cees M P M Hertogh; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Luc H J Deliens Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Shelley A Sternberg; Shiri Shinan-Altman; Ladislav Volicer; David J Casarett; Jenny T van der Steen Journal: Geriatrics (Basel) Date: 2021-04-22
Authors: Henrike J Schouten; Huiberdina L Koek; Marije Kruisman-Ebbers; Geert-Jan Geersing; Ruud Oudega; Marijke C Kars; Karel G M Moons; Johannes J M van Delden Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jenny T van der Steen; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Dirk L Knol; Miel W Ribbe; Luc Deliens Journal: BMC Med Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 8.775