Literature DB >> 12467791

Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models.

Dongwen Wang1, Mor Peleg, Samson W Tu, Aziz A Boxwala, Robert A Greenes, Vimla L Patel, Edward H Shortliffe.   

Abstract

Representation of clinical practice guidelines in a computer-interpretable format is a critical issue for guideline development, implementation, and evaluation. We studied 11 types of guideline representation models that can be used to encode guidelines in computer-interpretable formats. We have consistently found in all reviewed models that primitives for representation of actions and decisions are necessary components of a guideline representation model. Patient states and execution states are important concepts that closely relate to each other. Scheduling constraints on representation primitives can be modeled as sequences, concurrences, alternatives, and loops in a guideline's application process. Nesting of guidelines provides multiple views to a guideline with different granularities. Integration of guidelines with electronic medical records can be facilitated by the introduction of a formal model for patient data. Data collection, decision, patient state, and intervention constitute four basic types of primitives in a guideline's logic flow. Decisions clarify our understanding on a patient's clinical state, while interventions lead to the change from one patient state to another.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12467791     DOI: 10.1016/s1386-5056(02)00065-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  23 in total

1.  The InterMed approach to sharable computer-interpretable guidelines: a review.

Authors:  Mor Peleg; Aziz A Boxwala; Samson Tu; Qing Zeng; Omolola Ogunyemi; Dongwen Wang; Vimla L Patel; Robert A Greenes; Edward H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  GESDOR - a generic execution model for sharing of computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Dongwen Wang; Mor Peleg; Davis Bu; Michael Cantor; Giora Landesberg; Eitan Lunenfeld; Samson W Tu; Gail E Kaiser; George Hripcsak; Vimla L Patel; Edward H Shortliffe
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  A rule-based clinical decision model to support interpretation of multiple data in health examinations.

Authors:  Kuan-Liang Kuo; Chiou-Shann Fuh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  A health examination system integrated with clinical decision support system.

Authors:  Kuan-Liang Kuo; Chiou-Shann Fuh
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 4.460

5.  Comparison of primary care expert and computer-interpretable depression screening guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Jeeyae Choi; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  The SAGE Guideline Model: achievements and overview.

Authors:  Samson W Tu; James R Campbell; Julie Glasgow; Mark A Nyman; Robert McClure; James McClay; Craig Parker; Karen M Hrabak; David Berg; Tony Weida; James G Mansfield; Mark A Musen; Robert M Abarbanel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  A pattern-based analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages.

Authors:  Nataliya Mulyar; Wil M P van der Aalst; Mor Peleg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A constraint satisfaction approach to data-driven implementation of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Craig Kuziemsky; Dympna O'Sullivan; Wojtek Michalowski; Szymon Wilk; Ken Farion
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

Review 9.  Formal representation of eligibility criteria: a literature review.

Authors:  Chunhua Weng; Samson W Tu; Ida Sim; Rachel Richesson
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  Reasons for declining computerized insulin protocol recommendations: application of a framework.

Authors:  K Sward; J Orme; D Sorenson; L Baumann; A H Morris
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.