Literature DB >> 14527977

The InterMed approach to sharable computer-interpretable guidelines: a review.

Mor Peleg1, Aziz A Boxwala, Samson Tu, Qing Zeng, Omolola Ogunyemi, Dongwen Wang, Vimla L Patel, Robert A Greenes, Edward H Shortliffe.   

Abstract

InterMed is a collaboration among research groups from Stanford, Harvard, and Columbia Universities. The primary goal of InterMed has been to develop a sharable language that could serve as a standard for modeling computer-interpretable guidelines (CIGs). This language, called GuideLine Interchange Format (GLIF), has been developed in a collaborative manner and in an open process that has welcomed input from the larger community. The goals and experiences of the InterMed project and lessons that the authors have learned may contribute to the work of other researchers who are developing medical knowledge-based tools. The lessons described include (1) a work process for multi-institutional research and development that considers different viewpoints, (2) an evolutionary lifecycle process for developing medical knowledge representation formats, (3) the role of cognitive methodology to evaluate and assist in the evolutionary development process, (4) development of an architecture and (5) design principles for sharable medical knowledge representation formats, and (6) a process for standardization of a CIG modeling language.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14527977      PMCID: PMC305452          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  36 in total

1.  Sharable computer-based clinical practice guidelines: rationale, obstacles, approaches, and prospects.

Authors:  R A Greenes; M Peleg; A Boxwala; S Tu; V Patel; E H Shortliffe
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2001

2.  EON: a component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy.

Authors:  M A Musen; S W Tu; A K Das; Y Shahar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Representing clinical guidelines in GLIF: individual and collaborative expertise.

Authors:  V L Patel; V G Allen; J F Arocha; E H Shortliffe
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Y Shahar; S Miksch; P Johnson
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting.

Authors:  S Shea; W DuMouchel; L Bahamonde
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  A randomized trial of "corollary orders" to prevent errors of omission.

Authors:  J M Overhage; W M Tierney; X H Zhou; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  An architecture for a distributed guideline server.

Authors:  M Barnes; G O Barnett
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

Review 8.  Rationale for the Arden Syntax.

Authors:  G Hripcsak; P Ludemann; T A Pryor; O B Wigertz; P D Clayton
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1994-08

9.  A study of collaboration among medical informatics research laboratories.

Authors:  E H Shortliffe; V L Patel; J J Cimino; G O Barnett; R A Greenes
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.326

10.  The guideline interchange format: a model for representing guidelines.

Authors:  L Ohno-Machado; J H Gennari; S N Murphy; N L Jain; S W Tu; D E Oliver; E Pattison-Gordon; R A Greenes; E H Shortliffe; G O Barnett
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  16 in total

1.  Pragmatics of implementing guidelines on the front lines.

Authors:  Lemuel R Waitman; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A legal framework to enable sharing of Clinical Decision Support knowledge and services across institutional boundaries.

Authors:  Tonya Hongsermeier; Saverio Maviglia; Lana Tsurikova; Dan Bogaty; Roberto A Rocha; Howard Goldberg; Seth Meltzer; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

Review 3.  GEM at 10: a decade's experience with the Guideline Elements Model.

Authors:  Negin Hajizadeh; Nitu Kashyap; George Michel; Richard N Shiffman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

4.  An information system and medical record to support HIV treatment in rural Haiti.

Authors:  Hamish S F Fraser; Darius Jazayeri; Patrice Nevil; Yusuf Karacaoglu; Paul E Farmer; Evan Lyon; Mary Kay C Smith Fawzi; Fernet Leandre; Sharon S Choi; Joia S Mukherjee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-11-13

5.  Use of declarative statements in creating and maintaining computer-interpretable knowledge bases for guideline-based care.

Authors:  Samson W Tu; Karen M Hrabak; James R Campbell; Julie Glasgow; Mark A Nyman; Robert McClure; James McClay; Robert Abarbanel; James G Mansfield; Susana M Martins; Mary K Goldstein; Mark A Musen
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

6.  On implementing clinical decision support: achieving scalability and maintainability by combining business rules and ontologies.

Authors:  Vipul Kashyap; Alfredo Morales; Tonya Hongsermeier
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

7.  The SAGE Guideline Model: achievements and overview.

Authors:  Samson W Tu; James R Campbell; Julie Glasgow; Mark A Nyman; Robert McClure; James McClay; Craig Parker; Karen M Hrabak; David Berg; Tony Weida; James G Mansfield; Mark A Musen; Robert M Abarbanel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  A four-phase model of the evolution of clinical decision support architectures.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 9.  Conceptual knowledge acquisition in biomedicine: A methodological review.

Authors:  Philip R O Payne; Eneida A Mendonça; Stephen B Johnson; Justin B Starren
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 6.317

10.  A framework and model for evaluating clinical decision support architectures.

Authors:  Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 6.317

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.