Literature DB >> 12466461

Motion adaptation in area MT.

Richard J A Van Wezel1, Kenneth H Britten.   

Abstract

In many sensory systems, exposure to a prolonged stimulus causes adaptation, which tends to reduce neural responses to subsequent stimuli. Such effects are usually stimulus-specific, making adaptation a powerful probe into information processing. We used dynamic random dot kinematograms to test the magnitude and selectivity of adaptation effects in the middle temporal area (MT) and to compare them to effects on human motion discrimination. After 3 s of adaptation to a random dot pattern moving in the preferred direction, MT neuronal responses to subsequent test patterns were reduced by 26% on average compared with adaptation to a static pattern. This reduction in response magnitude was largely independent of what test stimulus was presented. However, adaptation in the opposite direction changed responses less often and very inconsistently. Therefore motion adaptation systematically and profoundly affects the neurons in MT representing the adapted direction, but much less those representing the opposite direction. In human psychophysical experiments, such adapting stimuli affected direction discrimination, biasing choices away from the adaptation direction. The magnitude of this perceptual shift was consistent with the magnitude of the changes seen in area MT, if one assumes that a motion comparison step occurs after MT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12466461     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00276.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

1.  The influence of sustained selective attention on stimulus selectivity in macaque visual area MT.

Authors:  Detlef Wegener; Winrich A Freiwald; Andreas K Kreiter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The effects of preceding moving stimuli on the initial part of smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  Masakatsu Taki; Kenichiro Miura; Hiromitsu Tabata; Yasuo Hisa; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  The biological basis of audition.

Authors:  Gregg H Recanzone; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Retinal adaptation to object motion.

Authors:  Bence P Olveczky; Stephen A Baccus; Markus Meister
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Relationship between adapted neural population responses in MT and motion adaptation in speed and direction of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The effects of prolonged viewing of motion on short-latency ocular following responses.

Authors:  Masakatsu Taki; Kenichiro Miura; Hiromitsu Tabata; Yasuo Hisa; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Similar adaptation effects in primary visual cortex and area MT of the macaque monkey under matched stimulus conditions.

Authors:  Carlyn A Patterson; Jacob Duijnhouwer; Stephanie C Wissig; Bart Krekelberg; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Practice-related improvement in working memory is modulated by changes in processing external interference.

Authors:  Anne S Berry; Theodore P Zanto; Aaron M Rutman; Wesley C Clapp; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 10.  The motion aftereffect reloaded.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.