BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains dismal, and their care poses a great challenge of customizing therapeutic strategies for individual patients. Lymph node staging is still less than ideal in esophageal cancer patients. Therefore, we investigated a new approach to lymph node analysis. METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven patients curatively resected for squamous cell cancer of the esophagus were studied. The long diameter of the largest metastatic lymph node (MLN) was measured on a histopathologic slide and was considered as the MLN size. RESULTS: Patient survival decreased with each millimeter increment in MLN size. By using MLN size as the lymph node classification criterion, patients with MLN <10 mm had both a significantly better overall and cancer-specific survival than those with MLN >or=10 mm. Patients with fewer than four MLNs were separated into prognostic groups according to the MLN size. Among the several prognostic factors, MLN size remained the strongest independent predictor of survival by multivariate analysis. This nodal analysis allowed stratification of patients into four stages with distinctly different survivals. CONCLUSIONS: This approach supplements traditional nodal staging strategies and therefore has potential for guiding the development of treatment strategies in this carcinoma.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains dismal, and their care poses a great challenge of customizing therapeutic strategies for individual patients. Lymph node staging is still less than ideal in esophageal cancerpatients. Therefore, we investigated a new approach to lymph node analysis. METHODS: One hundred eighty-seven patients curatively resected for squamous cell cancer of the esophagus were studied. The long diameter of the largest metastatic lymph node (MLN) was measured on a histopathologic slide and was considered as the MLN size. RESULTS:Patient survival decreased with each millimeter increment in MLN size. By using MLN size as the lymph node classification criterion, patients with MLN <10 mm had both a significantly better overall and cancer-specific survival than those with MLN >or=10 mm. Patients with fewer than four MLNs were separated into prognostic groups according to the MLN size. Among the several prognostic factors, MLN size remained the strongest independent predictor of survival by multivariate analysis. This nodal analysis allowed stratification of patients into four stages with distinctly different survivals. CONCLUSIONS: This approach supplements traditional nodal staging strategies and therefore has potential for guiding the development of treatment strategies in this carcinoma.
Authors: Marco Paolini; Kathrin Wirth; Amanda Tufman; Maximilian Reiser; Rudolf M Huber; Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Ali Chehrei; Sakineh Amoueian; Jamshid Ansari; Mehdi Montazer; Mohammad Hossein Sanei Journal: J Res Med Sci Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 1.852