Literature DB >> 30467719

Preoperative lymph node status on computed tomography influences the survival of pT1b, T2 and T3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Kotaro Sugawara1, Hiroharu Yamashita2, Yukari Uemura3, Koichi Yagi2, Masato Nishida2, Susumu Aikou2,4, Sachiyo Nomura2, Yasuyuki Seto2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The preoperative lymph node status is critical for tailoring optimal treatments for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of a diagnostic criterion based solely on the short-axis diameters of lymph nodes depicted on computed tomography (CT) in ESCC patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 246 pT1b-T3 ESCC patients undergoing upfront esophagectomy. Clinically positive lymph node metastasis (cN+) was defined as nodes with a short-axis diameter of at least 8 mm on CT.
RESULTS: Ninety-three patients had a cN+ status according to this criterion. The overall and recurrence-free survival rates were significantly lower in the cN+ group than in the cN- group (P < 0.001). The overall survival rate was markedly lower in the "pN2/3 and cN+" group than in the other groups (vs. pN0: P < 0.001, vs. pN1: P = 0.002, vs. "pN2/3 and cN-": P < 0.001). However, the overall survival rate of the "pN2/3 and cN-" group was similar to that of the pN0-1 groups. A multivariate analysis showed that cN+ (P = 0.002), major complications (P = 0.001), and pT3 (P = 0.021) were independently associated with a poor prognosis.
CONCLUSION: A diagnostic criterion based solely on the short-axis diameters of lymph nodes depicted on CT was useful for stratifying the survival in ESCC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Preoperative lymph node status

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467719     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1741-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  40 in total

1.  Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Numeric pathologic lymph node classification shows prognostic superiority to topographic pN classification in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kotaro Sugawara; Hiroharu Yamashita; Yukari Uemura; Takashi Mitsui; Koichi Yagi; Masato Nishida; Susumu Aikou; Kazuhiko Mori; Sachiyo Nomura; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Additional value of PET/CT over PET in assessment of locoregional lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Shuanghu Yuan; Yonghua Yu; K S Clifford Chao; Zheng Fu; Yong Yin; Tonghai Liu; Shaoqing Chen; Xinhua Yang; Guoren Yang; Hongbo Guo; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Preoperative assessment of tumor location and station-specific lymph node status in patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction.

Authors:  Brechtje A Grotenhuis; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan Werner Poley; John J Hermans; Katharina Biermann; Manon C W Spaander; Marco J Bruno; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Metastatic lymph node size and colorectal cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Dipok Kumar Dhar; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Naoko Kinukawa; Riruke Maruyama; Mitsuo Tachibana; Hitoshi Kohno; Hirofumi Kubota; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Histopathologic validation of lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: A prospective study based on primary surgery with extensive lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  T Lerut; P Flamen; N Ectors; E Van Cutsem; M Peeters; M Hiele; W De Wever; W Coosemans; G Decker; P De Leyn; G Deneffe; D Van Raemdonck; L Mortelmans
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Relationship Between the Size of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and Positron Emission Tomographic/Computer Tomographic Findings in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Seong Yong Park; Dae Joon Kim; Hee Suk Jung; Mi Jin Yun; Jeong Won Lee; Cheol Keun Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Metastasis to regional lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: CT versus FDG PET for presurgical detection prospective study.

Authors:  Young Cheol Yoon; Kyung Soo Lee; Young Mog Shim; Byung-Tae Kim; Kwhanmien Kim; Tae Sung Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  To be or not to be: significance of lymph nodes on pretreatment CT in predicting survival of rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Yong-Kun Chi; Xiao-Peng Zhang; Jie Li; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Risk factors for lymph node metastasis of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Chuangui Chen; Zhao Ma; Xiaobin Shang; Xiaofeng Duan; Jie Yue; Hongjing Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-03

2.  Detecting lymph node metastasis of esophageal cancer on dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Xuyang Sun; Tetsu Niwa; Soji Ozawa; Jun Endo; Jun Hashimoto
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 1.701

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.