Literature DB >> 31420748

Phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of monthly delayed-release versus daily immediate-release risedronate tablets in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis.

Satoshi Soen1, Hideaki Kishimoto2, Hiroshi Hagino3, Teruki Sone4, Hiroaki Ohishi5, Tsukasa Fujimoto6, Emma Sasaki6, Sakae Tanaka7, Toshitsugu Sugimoto8.   

Abstract

Absorption of oral immediate-release (IR) risedronate tablets is reduced by food intake, thus a delayed-release (DR) tablet has been developed to overcome the necessity of taking IR tablets under fasting conditions. This randomized, double-blind, phase II/III study compared efficacy and safety of risedronate IR once-daily (QD) and DR once-monthly (QM) tablets in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis. Patients received 2.5 mg IR on awakening QD, or 25 or 37.5 mg DR on awakening, following breakfast, or 30 min after breakfast, QM for 12 months. Primary endpoint was non-inferiority in mean percent change from baseline to end of study (month 12, last observation carried forward [M12, LOCF]) in mean lumbar spine (L2-L4) bone mineral density (BMD) between risedronate IR on awakening and DR following breakfast. Mean percent changes in (L2-L4) BMD at M12, LOCF were 5.07% (IR at awakening, n = 190), 3.36% (25 mg DR following breakfast, n = 194), and 4.11% (37.5 mg DR following breakfast, n = 181). Mean percent change in (L2-L4) BMD was numerically lower in the DR following breakfast groups versus the respective on awakening and 30 min after breakfast DR groups. Overall incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were comparable between groups. In the DR groups, 1.5-4.0% of patients reported TEAEs potentially associated with acute-phase reactions versus 0% in the IR group. In this study, non-inferiority could not be declared for 37.5 or 25 mg DR following breakfast QM (p = 0.1346 or p = 0.6711, respectively) versus 2.5 mg IR on awakening QD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delayed release; Immediate release; Japan; Osteoporosis; Risedronate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31420748     DOI: 10.1007/s00774-019-01031-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab        ISSN: 0914-8779            Impact factor:   2.626


  32 in total

Review 1.  Adverse effects of bisphosphonates: implications for osteoporosis management.

Authors:  Kurt A Kennel; Matthew T Drake
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Efficacy and tolerability of once-weekly administration of 17.5 mg risedronate in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis: a comparison with 2.5-mg once-daily dosage regimen.

Authors:  Hideaki Kishimoto; Masao Fukunaga; Kazuhiro Kushida; Masataka Shiraki; Akira Itabashi; Hajime Nawata; Toshitaka Nakamura; Hiroaki Ohta; Kunio Takaoka; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Role of Side Effects, Physician Involvement, and Patient Perception in Non-Adherence with Oral Bisphosphonates.

Authors:  Inbal Goldshtein; Vanessa Rouach; Naama Shamir-Stein; Jingbo Yu; Gabriel Chodick
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 4.  Examining the relationship between bone mineral density and fracture risk reduction during pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Gino Divittorio; Kirk L Jackson; Vishala L Chindalore; Weston Welker; J Bryan Walker
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  A comparison of the effect of risedronate and etidronate on lumbar bone mineral density in Japanese patients with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M Fukunaga; K Kushida; H Kishimoto; M Shiraki; Y Taketani; H Minaguchi; T Inoue; R Morita; H Morii; K Yamamoto; Y Ohashi; H Orimo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Patient adherence to osteoporosis medications: problems, consequences and management strategies.

Authors:  Alexandra Papaioannou; Courtney C Kennedy; Lisa Dolovich; Elaine Lau; Jonathan D Adachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 7.  Safety considerations with bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  William Strampel; Ronald Emkey; Roberto Civitelli
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision.

Authors:  Satoshi Soen; Masao Fukunaga; Toshitsugu Sugimoto; Teruki Sone; Saeko Fujiwara; Naoto Endo; Itsuo Gorai; Masataka Shiraki; Hiroshi Hagino; Takayuki Hosoi; Hiroaki Ohta; Toshiyuki Yoneda; Tatsushi Tomomitsu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Efficacy, tolerability and safety of once-monthly administration of 75mg risedronate in Japanese patients with involutional osteoporosis: a comparison with a 2.5mg once-daily dosage regimen.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hagino; Hideaki Kishimoto; Hiroaki Ohishi; Sayako Horii; Toshitaka Nakamura
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Clinical utility of risedronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient considerations with delayed-release formulation.

Authors:  Plamen Kinov; Mihail Boyanov
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2012-04-12
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Optimal Dosing Regimen of Osteoporosis Drugs in Relation to Food Intake as the Key for the Enhancement of the Treatment Effectiveness-A Concise Literature Review.

Authors:  Agnieszka Wiesner; Mariusz Szuta; Agnieszka Galanty; Paweł Paśko
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-03-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.