PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to explore the cause of the difference in the maximal rectal dose between the first and second high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy applications by comparing the thickness of the anterior rectal wall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The rectal dose and the thickness of the anterior rectal wall were analyzed in 26 patients with prostate cancer. After undergoing external beam radiation treatment with a total isocenter dose of 50 Gy, they were treated with HDR brachytherapy of 7.5 Gy/fraction, two fractions daily. The interval between the first HDR brachytherapy session and the second was 5 h. The rectal doses were directly surveyed during irradiation of the HDR brachytherapy. Thickening of the anterior rectal wall was measured at the same level by axial computed tomography scans obtained before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications. RESULTS: The maximal surveyed rectal doses during the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications were 188 +/- 51 cGy and 220 +/- 35 cGy, respectively (P < 0.01). The fluctuation ratio exceeded 1 in each case. The thickness of the anterior rectal wall before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications was 18.78 +/- 4.34 mm and 14.95 +/- 4.09 mm (P < 0.01), respectively. The fluctuation difference exceeded 0 in each case. CONCLUSION: The different rectal dose is attributable to thinning of the anterior rectal wall. The total rectal dose is within the range of doses at risk of exerting a toxic effect on the rectum.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to explore the cause of the difference in the maximal rectal dose between the first and second high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy applications by comparing the thickness of the anterior rectal wall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The rectal dose and the thickness of the anterior rectal wall were analyzed in 26 patients with prostate cancer. After undergoing external beam radiation treatment with a total isocenter dose of 50 Gy, they were treated with HDR brachytherapy of 7.5 Gy/fraction, two fractions daily. The interval between the first HDR brachytherapy session and the second was 5 h. The rectal doses were directly surveyed during irradiation of the HDR brachytherapy. Thickening of the anterior rectal wall was measured at the same level by axial computed tomography scans obtained before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications. RESULTS: The maximal surveyed rectal doses during the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications were 188 +/- 51 cGy and 220 +/- 35 cGy, respectively (P < 0.01). The fluctuation ratio exceeded 1 in each case. The thickness of the anterior rectal wall before the first and second HDR brachytherapy applications was 18.78 +/- 4.34 mm and 14.95 +/- 4.09 mm (P < 0.01), respectively. The fluctuation difference exceeded 0 in each case. CONCLUSION: The different rectal dose is attributable to thinning of the anterior rectal wall. The total rectal dose is within the range of doses at risk of exerting a toxic effect on the rectum.
Authors: Y Yoshioka; T Nose; K Yoshida; T Inoue; H Yamazaki; E Tanaka; H Shiomi; A Imai; S Nakamura; S Shimamoto; T Inoue Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: G S Merrick; W M Butler; A T Dorsey; J H Lief; H L Walbert; H J Blatt Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alvaro A Martinez; Gary Gustafson; José Gonzalez; Elwood Armour; Chris Mitchell; Gregory Edmundson; William Spencer; Jannifer Stromberg; Raywin Huang; Frank Vicini Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Martinez; J Gonzalez; J Stromberg; G Edmundson; M Plunkett; G Gustafson; D Brown; D Yan; F Vicini; D Brabbins Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1995-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Markus Karl Alfred Herrmann; Tammo Gsänger; Arne Strauss; Tereza Kertesz; Hendrik A Wolff; Hans Christiansen; Hilke Vorwerk; Clemens Friedrich Hess; Andrea Hille Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Markus K A Herrmann; Tereza Kertesz; Tammo Gsänger; Eugen Bloch; Gerhard Pollul; Mohamed Bouabdallaoui; Arne Strauss; Mareike Herrmann; Hans Christiansen; Hendrik A Wolff; Clemens F Hess; Andrea Hille Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-02-20 Impact factor: 3.481