Literature DB >> 12458916

HIV testing among pregnant women--United States and Canada, 1998-2001.

.   

Abstract

Since 1994, the availability of increasingly effective antiretroviral drugs for both the prevention of perinatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission and maternal treatment has resulted in a greater emphasis on prenatal HIV testing and substantial increases in prenatal testing rates. In 2000, preliminary data indicated that 766 (93%) of 824 HIV-infected women in 25 states knew their HIV status before delivery (CDC, unpublished data, 2002). However, an estimated 280-370 perinatal HIV transmissions continue to occur in the United States each year. The primary strategy to prevent perinatal HIV transmission is to maximize prenatal HIV testing of pregnant women. States and Canadian provinces have implemented three different prenatal HIV-testing approaches. To assess their effectiveness, CDC reviewed prenatal HIV-antibody testing rates associated with these approaches. Medical record data suggest that the "opt-in" voluntary testing approach is associated with lower testing rates than either the "opt-out" voluntary testing approach or the mandatory newborn HIV testing approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12458916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  29 in total

1.  Opt out, not opt in.

Authors:  Mark H Yudin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  HIV testing among U.S. women during prenatal care: findings from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  John E Anderson; Stephanie Sansom
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-09

3.  Promising strategies for preventing perinatal HIV transmission: model programs from three states.

Authors:  Jill Clark; Stephanie Sansom; B Joyce Simpson; Frances Walker; Cheryl Wheeler; Kelly Yazdani; Amy Zapata
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-06-03

4.  Testing for HIV infection in the United States.

Authors:  Lindsey L Wolf; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  Trends in prenatal discussion and HIV testing, 1996-2001: Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

Authors:  Amy Lansky; Stephanie L Sansom; Leslie L Harrison; Tonya Stancil
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-03-06

6.  Effects of written informed consent requirements on HIV testing rates: evidence from a natural experiment.

Authors:  Coady Wing
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Implications and impact of the new US Centers for Disease Control and prevention HIV testing guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer C Millen; Christian Arbelaez; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Toward elimination of perinatal HIV transmission: New Jersey hospital barriers to rapid HIV testing in labor and delivery, 2005.

Authors:  Carly E Kelley; Sindy M Paul; Firoozeh M Vali; Jane M Caruso; Rose M Martin; Patricia L Fleming
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Prenatal Screening for HIV in Nova Scotia: Survey of Postpartum Women and Audit of Current Prenatal Screening Practices.

Authors:  Mark Downing; Laura Youden; Beth A Halperin; Heather Scott; Bruce Smith; Scott A Halperin
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 10.  HIV testing for children in resource-limited settings: what are we waiting for?

Authors:  Scott Kellerman; Shaffiq Essajee
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.