Literature DB >> 17254508

Testing for HIV infection in the United States.

Lindsey L Wolf1, Rochelle P Walensky.   

Abstract

The process by which HIV-infected individuals are tested and identified has changed with the evolving HIV epidemic and public health response. In this review, we discuss the rationale for increased HIV testing as well as the current standards in HIV diagnostics and their inherent limitations. Current policy guidelines for routine HIV testing from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are divergent. However, national momentum toward the implementation of routine HIV testing programs continues based on the efficacy and feasibility of these programs in terms of HIV case identification and on recent reports of their cost-effectiveness. As routine, voluntary HIV screening programs are established, issues surrounding consent, reporting, and stigma still persist, as does the challenge of effectively linking detected HIV cases to care.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17254508     DOI: 10.1007/s11908-007-0026-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep        ISSN: 1523-3847            Impact factor:   3.725


  46 in total

1.  Predictors of failure to return for HIV test result and counseling by test site type.

Authors:  F Molitor; R A Bell; S R Truax; J D Ruiz; R K Sun
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  1999-02

2.  Effective HIV case identification through routine HIV screening at urgent care centers in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Rochelle P Walensky; Elena Losina; Laureen Malatesta; George E Barton; Catherine A O'Connor; Paul R Skolnik; Jonathan M Hall; Jean F McGuire; Kenneth A Freedberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Applying public health principles to the HIV epidemic.

Authors:  Thomas R Frieden; Moupali Das-Douglas; Scott E Kellerman; Kelly J Henning
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Screening for HIV: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  HIV testing without consent in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A population-based study of HIV testing practices and perceptions in 4 U.S. states.

Authors:  Traci A Takahashi; Kay M Johnson; Katharine A Bradley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Routine human immunodeficiency virus testing: an economic evaluation of current guidelines.

Authors:  Rochelle P Walensky; Milton C Weinstein; April D Kimmel; George R Seage; Elena Losina; Paul E Sax; Hong Zhang; Heather E Smith; Kenneth A Freedberg; A David Paltiel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Advancing HIV prevention: new strategies for a changing epidemic--United States, 2003.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2003-04-18       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Multistate evaluation of anonymous HIV testing and access to medical care. Multistate Evaluation of Surveillance of HIV (MESH) Study Group.

Authors:  A B Bindman; D Osmond; F M Hecht; J S Lehman; K Vranizan; D Keane; A Reingold
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-28       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Estimating the cost of unmet HIV-prevention needs in the United States.

Authors:  David R Holtgrave; Steven D Pinkerton; Michael Merson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Home testing for HIV infection in resource-limited settings.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Ingrid V Bassett; Krista L Dong; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.