Literature DB >> 12457422

Returns on research and development for 1990s new drug introductions.

Henry Grabowski1, John Vernon, Joseph A DiMasi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previously published research by the authors found that returns on research and development (R&D) for drugs introduced into the US market in the 1970s and 1980s were highly skewed and that the top decile of new drugs accounted for close to half the overall market value. In the 1990s, however, the R&D environment for new medicines underwent a number of changes including the following: the rapid growth of managed-care organisations; indications that R&D costs were rising at a rate faster than that of overall inflation; new market strategies of major firms aimed at simultaneous launches across world markets; and the increased attention focused on the pharmaceutical industry in the political arena.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the worldwide returns on R&D for drugs introduced into the US market in the first half of the 1990s, given that there have been significant changes to the R&D environment for new medicines over the past decade or so.
RESULTS: Analysis of new drugs entering the market from 1990 to 1994 resulted in findings similar to those of the earlier research - pharmaceutical R&D is characterised by a highly skewed distribution of returns and a mean industry internal rate of return modestly in excess of the cost of capital.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the distribution of returns on R&D for new drugs continues to be highly skewed, the analysis reveals that a number of dynamic forces are currently at work in the industry. In particular, R&D costs as well as new drug introductions, sales and contribution margins increased significantly compared with their 1980s values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12457422     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220003-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  8 in total

1.  The distribution of sales revenues from pharmaceutical innovation.

Authors:  H G Grabowski; J Vernon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Are the benefits of newer drugs worth their cost? Evidence from the 1996 MEPS.

Authors:  F R Lichtenberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  The link between gross profitability and pharmaceutical R&D spending.

Authors:  F M Scherer
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Is technological change in medicine worth it?

Authors:  D M Cutler; M McClellan
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Promotion of prescription drugs to consumers.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Ernst R Berndt; Julie M Donohue; Richard G Frank; Arnold M Epstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-02-14       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Ronald W Hansen; Henry G Grabowski
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 7.  Returns to R&D on new drug introductions in the 1980s.

Authors:  H G Grabowski; J M Vernon
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  Cost of innovation in the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  J A DiMasi; R W Hansen; H G Grabowski; L Lasagna
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.883

  8 in total
  31 in total

1.  The value of improving the productivity of the drug development process: faster times and better decisions.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Are the economics of pharmaceutical research and development changing?: productivity, patents and political pressures.

Authors:  Henry Grabowski
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The economics of follow-on drug research and development: trends in entry rates and the timing of development.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Cherie Paquette
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Strategic challenges in neurotherapeutic pharmaceutical development.

Authors:  Christopher C Gallen
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2004-01

Review 5.  Role of pharmacoeconomic analysis in R&D decision making: when, where, how?

Authors:  Paul Miller
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Price differentiation and transparency in the global pharmaceutical marketplace.

Authors:  David B Ridley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Rebuttal: are drugs too expensive in Canada?

Authors:  Joel Lexchin; Russell Williams; Jean Marion
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Are drugs too expensive in Canada? Yes.

Authors:  Joel Lexchin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Replace pharmaceutical patents now.

Authors:  Earl L Grinols; James W Henderson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Economic return of clinical trials performed under the pediatric exclusivity program.

Authors:  Jennifer S Li; Eric L Eisenstein; Henry G Grabowski; Elizabeth D Reid; Barry Mangum; Kevin A Schulman; John V Goldsmith; M Dianne Murphy; Robert M Califf; Daniel K Benjamin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.