Literature DB >> 12453213

Retrotransposition of the Ll.LtrB group II intron proceeds predominantly via reverse splicing into DNA targets.

Kenji Ichiyanagi1, Arthur Beauregard, Stacey Lawrence, Dorie Smith, Benoit Cousineau, Marlene Belfort.   

Abstract

Catalytic group II introns are mobile retroelements that invade cognate intronless genes via retrohoming, where the introns reverse splice into double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) targets. They can also retrotranspose to ectopic sites at low frequencies. Whereas our previous studies with a bacterial intron, Ll.LtrB, supported frequent use of RNA targets during retrotransposition, recent experiments with a retrotransposition indicator gene indicate that DNA, rather than RNA, is a prominent target, with both dsDNA and single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) as possibilities. Thus retrotransposition occurs in both transcriptional sense and antisense orientations of target genes, and is largely independent of homologous DNA recombination and of the endonuclease function of the intron-encoded protein, LtrA. Models based on both dsDNA and ssDNA targeting are presented. Interestingly, retrotransposition is biased toward the template for lagging-strand DNA synthesis, which suggests the possibility of the replication folk as a source of ssDNA. Consistent with some use of ssDNA targets, many retrotransposition sites lack nucleotides critical for the unwinding of target duplex DNA. Moreover, in vitro the intron reverse spliced into ssDNA more efficiently than dsDNA substrates for some of the retrotransposition sites. Furthermore, many bacterial group II introns reside on the lagging-strand template, hinting at a role for DNA replication in intron dispersal in nature.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12453213     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03226.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  58 in total

1.  Targeted and random bacterial gene disruption using a group II intron (targetron) vector containing a retrotransposition-activated selectable marker.

Authors:  Jin Zhong; Michael Karberg; Alan M Lambowitz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  A bacterial group II intron favors retrotransposition into plasmid targets.

Authors:  Kenji Ichiyanagi; Arthur Beauregard; Marlene Belfort
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The RmInt1 group II intron has two different retrohoming pathways for mobility using predominantly the nascent lagging strand at DNA replication forks for priming.

Authors:  Francisco Martínez-Abarca; Antonio Barrientos-Durán; Manuel Fernández-López; Nicolás Toro
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Bacterial thymidylate synthase with intein, group II Intron, and distinctive ThyX motifs.

Authors:  Xiang-Qin Liu; Jing Yang
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Conserved target for group II intron insertion in relaxase genes of conjugative elements of gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Jack H Staddon; Edward M Bryan; Dawn A Manias; Gary M Dunny
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Abortive transposition by a group II intron in yeast mitochondria.

Authors:  Lorna Dickson; Stuart Connell; Hon-Ren Huang; R Michael Henke; Lu Liu; Philip S Perlman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Contribution of base-pairing interactions between group II intron fragments during trans-splicing in vivo.

Authors:  Cecilia Quiroga; Lisa Kronstad; Christine Ritlop; Audrey Filion; Benoit Cousineau
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 4.942

Review 8.  Group II introns: mobile ribozymes that invade DNA.

Authors:  Alan M Lambowitz; Steven Zimmerly
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

9.  Restriction for gene insertion within the Lactococcus lactis Ll.LtrB group II intron.

Authors:  Isabelle Plante; Benoit Cousineau
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  Efficient computation of optimal oligo-RNA binding.

Authors:  Nathan O Hodas; Daniel P Aalberts
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-12-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.