Literature DB >> 12452398

Hypopharyngeal pH monitoring artifact in detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

John M Wo1, Abdul Jabbar, Welby Winstead, Steve Goudy, Robert Cacchione, Jeff W Allen.   

Abstract

Hypopharyngeal pH artifacts have been a concern in the detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Our purpose was to analyze and quantify artifacts from dual-sensor hypopharyngeal pH monitoring. In all, 42 hypopharyngeal and 58 esophageal pH studies were reviewed. Type 1 (out of range), type 2 (pH drift), and type 3 (isolated pH drop) artifacts were identified. The proportion of proximal-sensor pH drop to <4 that was artifactual was determined. The median number (range) of artifacts was 1 (0-17) and 2 (0-28) for hypopharyngeal and esophageal pH studies, respectively (P = NS). The median proportion of artifactual pH drop to <4 was 1% (0-84%) and 2% (0-74%) for hypopharyngeal and esophageal pH studies, respectively (P = NS). The diagnosis did not change in any patient after excluding pH artifacts. In all, 19% of the combined 2,432 hypopharyngeal pH drops of <4 were artifacts. In conclusion, hypopharyngeal pH artifacts per study were uncommon but can be prominent in a few patients. One can identify these artifacts and exclude them from analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12452398     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020584731503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  22 in total

1.  Ambulatory esophageal and hypopharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with hoarseness.

Authors:  P O Katz
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Ambulatory pH measurements at the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  C F Smit; J Tan; P P Devriese; L M Mathus-Vliegen; M Brandsen; P F Schouwenburg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J A Koufman; W C Wu; J B Cooper; J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Contact ulcer of the larynx.

Authors:  J Cherry; S I Margulies
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 5.  Technical aspects of intraluminal pH-metry in man: current status and recommendations.

Authors:  C Emde; A Garner; A L Blum
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of physiological gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  B L Weusten; L M Akkermans; G P vanBerge-Henegouwen; A J Smout
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-03

7.  Presumed laryngo-pharyngeal reflux: investigate or treat?

Authors:  A G Fraser; R P Morton; J Gillibrand
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.469

8.  Combined ambulatory esophageal manometry and dual-probe pH-metry in evaluation of patients with chronic unexplained cough.

Authors:  W G Paterson; B W Murat
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Esophagopharyngeal distribution of refluxed gastric acid in patients with reflux laryngitis.

Authors:  R Shaker; M Milbrath; J Ren; R Toohill; W J Hogan; Q Li; C L Hofmann
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury.

Authors:  J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  5 in total

1.  A new technique for measurement of pharyngeal pH: normal values and discriminating pH threshold.

Authors:  S Ayazi; J C Lipham; J A Hagen; A L Tang; J Zehetner; J M Leers; A Oezcelik; E Abate; F Banki; S R DeMeester; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Martin Duricek; Peter Banovcin; Tatiana Halickova; Rudolf Hyrdel; Marian Kollarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Proximal sensor data from routine dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring is often inaccurate.

Authors:  Matt McCollough; Abdul Jabbar; Robert Cacchione; Jeff W Allen; Steve Harrell; John M Wo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Ratio between proximal/distal gastroesophageal reflux does not discriminate abnormal proximal reflux.

Authors:  Sebastião Carlos Pannocchia Neto; Fernando A M Herbella; Luciana C Silva; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  A Study to Draw a Normative Database of Laryngopharynx pH Profile in Chinese.

Authors:  Guijian Feng; Junyao Wang; Lihong Zhang; Yulan Liu
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.924

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.