Literature DB >> 12450703

Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a live attenuated tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine.

Terry Nolan1, Peter McIntyre, Don Roberton, Dominique Descamps.   

Abstract

In countries where routine varicella vaccination is implemented, it is usually given at the same age as that recommended for measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination. A combined multivalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine would offer the convenience of a single injection and facilitate implementation of varicella vaccination into routine childhood immunisation schedules. We evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a tetravalent MMRV candidate vaccine compared to an extemporaneous mix of a measles-mumps-rubella vaccine and varicella vaccine (MMR/V), and to a measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine alone. A multicentre study was conducted in which a total of 240 healthy children aged 12 months (80 per group) were randomised to receive MMRV, MMR/V, or MMR alone. Active surveillance for adverse events was undertaken for 43 days post-vaccination. Blood samples were taken prior to vaccination and at 60 days post-vaccination. There were no significant differences between groups in rates of pain, redness, or swelling at the site of vaccination. There was no significant difference in the rate of any fever (axillary temperature >or=37.5 degrees C) and grade 3 fever (axillary temperature >39.0 degrees C) between the groups receiving MMRV and MMR during the 43-day follow-up period. Although, a significant increase was found for fever of any cause with onset between days 0 and 14 for MMRV compared to the MMR group, there was no significant difference in grade 3 fever rates during the same period. With respect to immunogenicity, MMRV and MMR/V demonstrated similar seroconversion rates to each component compared to MMR alone, with at least 91.9% of subjects in all groups seroconverting to each vaccine component 60 days after vaccination. Decreased GMTs for varicella antibody at day 60 indicated that there may have been inhibition of this response compared to MMR/V. This tetravalent MMRV candidate vaccine showed promising results, although further examination of the possible increase in minor fever and decreased varicella immunogenicity should be assessed in future studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12450703     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00459-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  17 in total

Review 1.  Vaccines for post-exposure prophylaxis against varicella (chickenpox) in children and adults.

Authors:  Kristine Macartney; Anita Heywood; Peter McIntyre
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-23

2.  Statement on Measles-Mumps-Rubella-Varicella Vaccine: An Advisory Committee Statement (ACS) National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).

Authors:  Ben Tan; Shainoor Ismail
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2010-09-21

Review 3.  Primary versus secondary failure after varicella vaccination: implications for interval between 2 doses.

Authors:  Paolo Bonanni; Anne Gershon; Michael Gershon; Andrea Kulcsár; Vassiliki Papaevangelou; Bernard Rentier; Catherine Sadzot-Delvaux; Vytautas Usonis; Timo Vesikari; Catherine Weil-Olivier; Peter de Winter; Peter Wutzler
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Analysis of Morphological Changes in the CNS and Internal Organs of Macaca mulatta Monkeys after Intracerebral Injection of a Low-Attenuated Rubella Virus Strain.

Authors:  O A Shamsutdinova; D V Bulgin; D D Karal-Ogly; I N Lavrent'eva
Journal:  Bull Exp Biol Med       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 0.804

5.  Complete DNA sequences of two oka strain varicella-zoster virus genomes.

Authors:  Sueli L Tillieux; Wendy S Halsey; Elizabeth S Thomas; John J Voycik; Ganesh M Sathe; Ventzislav Vassilev
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Measles, mumps, rubella vaccine (Priorix; GSK-MMR): a review of its use in the prevention of measles, mumps and rubella.

Authors:  Keri Wellington; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Live attenuated measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella zoster virus vaccine (Priorix-Tetra).

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Safety, immunogenicity and immediate pain of intramuscular versus subcutaneous administration of a measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine to children aged 11-21 months.

Authors:  Markus Knuf; Fred Zepp; Claudius U Meyer; Pirmin Habermehl; Lothar Maurer; Hanns-Michael Burow; Ulrich Behre; Michel Janssens; Paul Willems; Helmtrud Bisanz; Volker Vetter; Ruprecht Schmidt-Ott
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.860

9.  Immunogenicity and safety of a tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine co-administered with a booster dose of a combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine in healthy children aged 12-23 months.

Authors:  Fred Zepp; Ulrich Behre; Klaus Kindler; Karl-Heinz Laakmann; Heidemarie Pankow-Culot; Wilma Mannhardt-Laakmann; François Beckers; Dominique Descamps; Paul Willems
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 3.860

10.  Immunogenicity and safety of early vaccination with two doses of a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine in healthy Indian children from 9 months of age: a phase III, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Sanjay Lalwani; Sukanta Chatterjee; Sundaram Balasubramanian; Ashish Bavdekar; Shailesh Mehta; Sanjoy Datta; Michael Povey; Ouzama Henry
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.