Literature DB >> 12448808

Research on patients' views in the evaluation and improvement of quality of care.

M Wensing1, G Elwyn.   

Abstract

The identification of methods for assessing the views of patients on health care has only developed over the last decade or so. The use of patients' views to improve healthcare delivery requires valid and reliable measurement methods. Four approaches are recognised: inclusion of patients' views in the information to those seeking health care, identification of patient preferences in episodes of care, patient feedback on delivery of health care, and patients' views in decision making on healthcare systems. Outcome measures for the evaluation of the use of patients' views should reflect the aims in terms of processes or outcomes of care, including possible negative consequences. Rigorous methodologies for the evaluation of methods have yet to be implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12448808      PMCID: PMC1743612          DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  27 in total

1.  Public disclosure of performance data: learning from the US experience.

Authors:  M N Marshall; P G Shekelle; S Leatherman; R H Brook
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

2.  Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  M Ryan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  A trial for comparing methods for eliciting treatment preferences from men with advanced prostate cancer: results from the initial visit.

Authors:  J Souchek; J R Stacks; B Brody; C M Ashton; R B Giesler; M M Byrne; K Cook; J M Geraci; N P Wray
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain a qualitative study.

Authors:  H Schers; M Wensing; Z Huijsmans; M van Tulder; R Grol
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Quality of care from the perspective of elderly people: the QUOTE-elderly instrument.

Authors:  H J Sixma; C van Campen; J J Kerssens; L Peters
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.668

6.  Comparison of patients' preferences and evaluations regarding aspects of general practice care.

Authors:  H Jung; M Wensing; A de Wilt; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 7.  Can patients evaluate the quality of hospital care?

Authors:  H R Rubin
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1990

8.  Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP).

Authors:  R Grol; M Wensing; J Mainz; P Ferreira; H Hearnshaw; P Hjortdahl; F Olesen; M Ribacke; T Spenser; J Szécsényi
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?

Authors:  B Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey.

Authors:  J F Etter; T V Perneger
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  17 in total

1.  Views of patients and general dental practitioners on the organizational aspects of a general dental practice.

Authors:  Rutger Sonneveld; Wolter Brands; Ewald Bronkhorst; Gert-Jan Truin
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The importance of physician-patient relationship for improvement of adherence to long-term therapy: data of survey in a cohort of multiple sclerosis patients with mild and moderate disability.

Authors:  Tatiana Koudriavtseva; Emanuela Onesti; Isabella Fernanda Pestalozza; Isabella Sperduti; Bruno Jandolo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  A survey of patients' attitudes to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy identifies the value of endoscopist-patient interactive factors.

Authors:  T Hydes; A Yusuf; D S Pearl; T M Trebble
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-05-04

4.  What do patients want from high-quality general practice and how do we involve them in improvement?

Authors:  Angela Coulter; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  A maximum difference scaling survey of barriers to intensive combination treatment strategies with glucocorticoids in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sabrina Meyfroidt; Marlies Hulscher; Diederik De Cock; Kristien Van der Elst; Johan Joly; René Westhovens; Patrick Verschueren
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Patient satisfaction from two studies of collaborative doctor-pharmacist prescribing in Australia.

Authors:  Andrew Hale; Ian Coombes; Julie Stokes; Stuart Aitken; Fiona Clark; Lisa Nissen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Patient perspectives on interpersonal aspects of healthcare and patient-centeredness at primary health facilities: A mixed methods study in rural Eastern Uganda.

Authors:  Everlyn Waweru; Tom Smekens; Joanna Orne-Gliemann; Freddie Ssengooba; Jacqueline Broerse; Bart Criel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Quality indicators for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ilgin G Arslan; Rianne M Rozendaal; Marienke van Middelkoop; Saskia A G Stitzinger; Maarten-Paul Van de Kerkhove; Vincent M I Voorbrood; Patrick J E Bindels; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Dieuwke Schiphof
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2021-05

9.  Target for improvement: a cluster randomised trial of public involvement in quality-indicator prioritisation (intervention development and study protocol).

Authors:  Antoine Boivin; Pascale Lehoux; Réal Lacombe; Anaïs Lacasse; Jako Burgers; Richard Grol
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Quality indicators for continuous monitoring to improve maternal and infant health in maternity departments: a modified Delphi survey of an international multidisciplinary panel.

Authors:  Rym Boulkedid; Olivier Sibony; François Goffinet; Arnaud Fauconnier; Bernard Branger; Corinne Alberti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.