RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: This study was to measure localized ground-glass attenuation (GGA) in the peripheral lung on thin-section computed tomography (CT) and to assess any relationship between the attenuation and lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight surgically resected tumors with localized GGA at thin-section CT were studied. The tumors were histologically diagnosed as 8 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), 11 bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), and 9 BAC with fibrosis. We assumed three concentric circles, which were 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 times the diameter of each tumor and measured the average CT values corresponding to inside each circle. We calculated a difference in CT value between 0.8 and 1.2 times the diameter of the tumor and defined as the contrast index. RESULTS: The contrast index for tumors with AAH, BAC, and BAC with fibrosis were 19.8 +/- 8.3, 42.5 +/- 16.0 (P < 0.05 vs. group with AAH), and 111.4 +/- 32.6 (P < 0.0001 vs. Group with BAC), respectively. The contrast index became greater in the stepwise progression from AAH to BAC and from BAC to BAC with fibrosis. CONCLUSION: The contrast index correlated histologic findings of the tumor growth in BAC. The contrast index may be a useful and objective measurement for determining surgical treatment for localized GGA in preoperative diagnosis.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE: This study was to measure localized ground-glass attenuation (GGA) in the peripheral lung on thin-section computed tomography (CT) and to assess any relationship between the attenuation and lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight surgically resected tumors with localized GGA at thin-section CT were studied. The tumors were histologically diagnosed as 8 atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), 11 bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), and 9 BAC with fibrosis. We assumed three concentric circles, which were 0.8, 1.0, and 1.2 times the diameter of each tumor and measured the average CT values corresponding to inside each circle. We calculated a difference in CT value between 0.8 and 1.2 times the diameter of the tumor and defined as the contrast index. RESULTS: The contrast index for tumors with AAH, BAC, and BAC with fibrosis were 19.8 +/- 8.3, 42.5 +/- 16.0 (P < 0.05 vs. group with AAH), and 111.4 +/- 32.6 (P < 0.0001 vs. Group with BAC), respectively. The contrast index became greater in the stepwise progression from AAH to BAC and from BAC to BAC with fibrosis. CONCLUSION: The contrast index correlated histologic findings of the tumor growth in BAC. The contrast index may be a useful and objective measurement for determining surgical treatment for localized GGA in preoperative diagnosis.
Authors: William D Travis; Elisabeth Brambilla; Masayuki Noguchi; Andrew G Nicholson; Kim R Geisinger; Yasushi Yatabe; David G Beer; Charles A Powell; Gregory J Riely; Paul E Van Schil; Kavita Garg; John H M Austin; Hisao Asamura; Valerie W Rusch; Fred R Hirsch; Giorgio Scagliotti; Tetsuya Mitsudomi; Rudolf M Huber; Yuichi Ishikawa; James Jett; Montserrat Sanchez-Cespedes; Jean-Paul Sculier; Takashi Takahashi; Masahiro Tsuboi; Johan Vansteenkiste; Ignacio Wistuba; Pan-Chyr Yang; Denise Aberle; Christian Brambilla; Douglas Flieder; Wilbur Franklin; Adi Gazdar; Michael Gould; Philip Hasleton; Douglas Henderson; Bruce Johnson; David Johnson; Keith Kerr; Keiko Kuriyama; Jin Soo Lee; Vincent A Miller; Iver Petersen; Victor Roggli; Rafael Rosell; Nagahiro Saijo; Erik Thunnissen; Ming Tsao; David Yankelewitz Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Chang Min Park; Jin Mo Goo; Hyun Ju Lee; Chang Hyun Lee; Doo Hyun Chung; Eun Ju Chun; Jung-Gi Im Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Hyun Ju Lee; Jin Mo Goo; Chang Hyun Lee; Chul-Gyu Yoo; Young Tae Kim; Jung-Gi Im Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.500