Literature DB >> 12439235

Long-term followup of nonmodular total knee replacements.

E Michael Keating1, John B Meding, Philip M Faris, Merrill A Ritter.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate and determine the mechanism and etiology of failure of components that failed in long-term followup of Anatomic Graduated Component total knee replacements. The authors previously reported the survivorship of 4583 Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasties done during a 17-year period. The current study was done to evaluate the etiology and cause of failure of the components that failed. There were six (0.18%) failures of the femoral component. There were 21 tibia components that failed (0.46%). Twelve tibial components failed because of an osteonecrotic lesion in the medial tibia plateau. The clinical survival rate with revision or loosening of one or more components was 98.9% at 15 years. No component was revised for polyethylene wear or osteolysis. This total knee replacement has proved to have minimal wear and excellent longevity with time with no revisions between 10 and 15 years despite having nearly flat-on-flat geometry and retaining the posterior cruciate ligament. The most common cause for revision (12 tibial components) was because of an osteonecrotic lesion in the medial tibia plateau, which developed after surgery and led to loosening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12439235     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  36 in total

1.  The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: an independent 10-year survival analysis.

Authors:  Peter Vorlat; Guy Putzeys; Dominique Cottenie; Tom Van Isacker; Nicole Pouliart; Frank Handelberg; Pierre-Paul Casteleyn; Filip Gheysen; René Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-05-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  [Axial correction in knee revision arthroplasty].

Authors:  C Perka; S Tohtz; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty using the contralateral knee as a control group: a case-control study.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Michael G Zywiel; Thorsten M Seyler; Seung Yong Lee; Mike S McGrath; David R Marker; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The mini-incision mid-vastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Flören; Heiko Reichel; Jack Davis; Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Primary stability of tibial components in TKA: in vitro comparison of two cementing techniques.

Authors:  Adrian Skwara; J Figiel; T Knott; J R J Paletta; S Fuchs-Winkelmann; C O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Current role of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; M Flören; R Bieger; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Minimizing dynamic knee spacer complications in infected revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Siraj A Sayeed; Qais Naziri; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Midterm assessment of causes and results of revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fahad Hossain; Shelain Patel; Fares Sami Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  The benefit of revision knee arthroplasty for component malrotation after primary total knee replacement.

Authors:  Amir Sternheim; Jasjit Lochab; Michael Drexler; Paul Kuzyk; Oleg Safir; Allan Gross; David Backstein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.