Literature DB >> 21720881

[Current role of minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis].

T Kappe1, M Flören, R Bieger, H Reichel.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive approaches are increasingly being used in total knee arthroplasty. By means of a review of the literature the pros and cons of minimally invasive approaches for total knee arthroplasty were analyzed. The potential advantages of reduced postoperative pain and improved early range of motion and mobility are opposed by the risks of malpositioning of the prosthetic components and impaired wound healing. Long-term improvement of knee function and quality of life should not be compromised by techniques promising temporary or secondary advantages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21720881     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-011-1791-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  60 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial comparing the radiologic outcomes of conventional and minimally invasive techniques for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pak Lin Chin; Leon Siang Shen Foo; Kuang Ying Yang; Seng Jin Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with traditional total knee arthroplasty. Assessment of the learning curve and the postoperative recuperative period.

Authors:  Jason King; Daniel L Stamper; Douglas C Schaad; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  [Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty through a quadriceps sparing approach: a comparative study].

Authors:  Hao Shen; Xian-long Zhang; Qi Wang; Jun-jie Shao; Yao Jiang
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2007-08-15

4.  Complications following quadriceps-sparing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gabriel Jackson; Barry J Waldman; Esther A Schaftel
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.390

5.  A comparison of isokinetic strength testing and gait analysis in patients with posterior cruciate-retaining and substituting knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  A A Bolanos; W A Colizza; P D McCann; R S Gotlin; M E Wootten; B A Kahn; J N Insall
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Rapid ambulation and range of motion after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aree Tanavalee; Satit Thiengwittayaporn; Srihatach Ngarmukos
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2004-09

7.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use.

Authors:  Richard S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Michael A Mont; Margo McMahon; Phillip S Ragland; Mark Kester
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Clinical experience with less invasive surgery techniques in total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study.

Authors:  Shankar N Kashyap; J W van Ommeren
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Thomas M Coon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  [The minimally invasive anterolateral approach. A review of the literature].

Authors:  A Roth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.