Literature DB >> 12435665

In vivo efficacy of continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing of linezolid compared to vancomycin in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rabbit endocarditis model.

Cédric Jacqueline1, Eric Batard, Lucia Perez, David Boutoille, Antoine Hamel, Jocelyne Caillon, Marie-France Kergueris, Gilles Potel, Denis Bugnon.   

Abstract

Linezolid is the first drug issued from the oxazolidinones, a novel class of antimicrobial agents with potent activity against gram-positive pathogens. A rabbit endocarditis model was used to compare the in vivo activities of different linezolid regimens mimicking intermittent dosing of 10 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h for 5 days or continuous (constant-rate) infusion of a daily dose of 20 mg/kg (for 5 days) or 40 mg/kg (for 3 and 5 days) and the activities of intermittent dosing and continuous infusion of vancomycin (for 5 days). The in vivo activities of these regimens were tested against three strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A human-like pharmacokinetic simulation was used for linezolid in order to improve the extrapolation of the results to human therapy. All linezolid regimens significantly reduced the numbers of S. aureus cells in aortic valve vegetations compared to the numbers in the control groups. Linezolid intermittent dosing had an in vivo bacteriostatic effect. Switching from intermittent dosing to continuous infusion (at the same dose) led to in vivo bactericidal activity, with a decrease of at least 3 log(10) CFU/g of vegetation compared to the counts for the controls. After 5 days of treatment, continuous infusion of linezolid (corresponding to a daily dose of 40 mg/kg in humans) seemed to be at least as effective as vancomycin against the three strains. No resistant variant was isolated from the vegetations during any of the treatments. These data suggest that continuous infusion of linezolid could be an appropriate alternative to the use of glycopeptides for the treatment of severe methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12435665      PMCID: PMC132754          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.12.3706-3711.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

1.  Linezolid and reversible myelosuppression.

Authors:  S L Green; J C Maddox; E D Huttenbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Linezolid levels in pancreatic secretions.

Authors:  G G Rao; A Steger; C M Tobin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Determination of linezolid in plasma by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  G W Peng; R P Stryd; S Murata; M Igarashi; K Chiba; H Aoyama; M Aoyama; T Zenki; N Ozawa
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.935

4.  In vivo efficacy of continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing of ceftazidime alone or in combination with amikacin relative to human kinetic profiles in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa rabbit endocarditis model.

Authors:  M A Robaux; L Dube; J Caillon; D Bugnon; M F Kergueris; D Navas; P Le Conte; D Baron; G Potel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Infections due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium resistant to linezolid.

Authors:  R D Gonzales; P C Schreckenberger; M B Graham; S Kelkar; K DenBesten; J P Quinn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Thrombocytopenia associated with linezolid therapy.

Authors:  Kinan Attassi; Ellie Hershberger; Rabiul Alam; Marcus J Zervos
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Linezolid resistance in a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S Tsiodras; H S Gold; G Sakoulas; G M Eliopoulos; C Wennersten; L Venkataraman; R C Moellering; M J Ferraro
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Linezolid-Induced anemia and thrombocytopenia.

Authors:  Travis W Waldrep; Daniel J Skiest
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.705

9.  Efficacy of linezolid in treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C F Dailey; C L Dileto-Fang; L V Buchanan; M P Oramas-Shirey; D H Batts; C W Ford; J K Gibson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Mechanism of action of oxazolidinones: effects of linezolid and eperezolid on translation reactions.

Authors:  D L Shinabarger; K R Marotti; R W Murray; A H Lin; E P Melchior; S M Swaney; D S Dunyak; W F Demyan; J M Buysse
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness.

Authors:  Rina Mehrotra; Raffaele De Gaudio; Mark Palazzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  In vitro and in vivo synergistic activities of linezolid combined with subinhibitory concentrations of imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Cédric Jacqueline; Dominique Navas; Eric Batard; Anne-Françoise Miegeville; Virginie Le Mabecque; Marie-France Kergueris; Denis Bugnon; Gilles Potel; Jocelyne Caillon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Linezolid in prophylaxis against experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  George Athanassopoulos; Angelos Pefanis; Vissaria Sakka; Dimitrios Iliopoulos; Despina Perrea; Helen Giamarellou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Pharmacological issues of linezolid: an updated critical review.

Authors:  Antonello Di Paolo; Paolo Malacarne; Emanuele Guidotti; Romano Danesi; Mario Del Tacca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  In vitro and in vivo assessment of linezolid combined with ertapenem: a highly synergistic combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Cedric Jacqueline; Jocelyne Caillon; Olivier Grossi; Virginie Le Mabecque; Anne-Françoise Miegeville; Denis Bugnon; Eric Batard; Gilles Potel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacokinetics of linezolid treatment using intravenous and oral administrations in extremely premature infants.

Authors:  Mélanie Sicard; Elise Launay; Jocelyne Caillon; Cédric Jacqueline; Arnaud Legrand; Guillaume Deslandes; Dominique Navas; Jean-Christophe Rozé; Christèle Gras-Le Guen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic factors influencing emergence of resistance to linezolid in an in vitro model.

Authors:  Lauren M Boak; Jian Li; Craig R Rayner; Roger L Nation
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antibacterial agents.

Authors:  Matthew E Levison; Julie H Levison
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.982

9.  Novel concentration-killing curve method for estimation of bactericidal potency of antibiotics in an in vitro dynamic model.

Authors:  Y Q Liu; Y Z Zhang; P J Gao
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Clinical pharmacodynamics of linezolid in seriously ill patients treated in a compassionate use programme.

Authors:  Craig R Rayner; Alan Forrest; Alison K Meagher; Mary C Birmingham; Jerome J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.