Literature DB >> 11328773

In vivo efficacy of continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing of ceftazidime alone or in combination with amikacin relative to human kinetic profiles in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa rabbit endocarditis model.

M A Robaux1, L Dube, J Caillon, D Bugnon, M F Kergueris, D Navas, P Le Conte, D Baron, G Potel.   

Abstract

Ceftazidime and amikacin were administered in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa rabbit endocarditis model using computer-controlled intravenous (iv) infusion pumps to simulate human serum concentrations for the following regimens: continuous (constant rate) infusion of 4, 6 or 8 g of ceftazidime over 24 h or intermittent dosing of 2 g every 8 h either alone or in combination with amikacin (15 mg/kg once daily). The in vivo activities of these regimens were tested on four Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Animals were killed 24 h after the beginning of treatment. Efficacy was assessed by comparing the effects of the different groups on bacterial counts in vegetations for each strain tested. For a susceptible reference strain (ATCC 27853; MICs of ceftazidime and amikacin 1 and 2 mg/L, respectively), continuous infusion of 4 g alone or with amikacin was as effective as intermittent dosing with amikacin. For a clinical isolate producing an oxacillinase (MICs of ceftazidime and amikacin 8 and 32 mg/L, respectively), continuous infusion of 6 g was equivalent to intermittent dosing. For a clinical isolate producing a TEM-2 penicillinase (MIC of ceftazidime and amikacin 4 mg/L), continuous infusion of 6 g, but not intermittent dosing, had a significant in vivo effect. For a clinical isolate producing an inducible, chromosomally encoded cephalosporinase (MIC of ceftazidime and amikacin 8 and 4 mg/L, respectively), neither continuous infusion nor intermittent dosing proved effective. Determination of ceftazidime concentrations in vegetations showed that continuous infusion produced tissue concentrations at the infection site far greater than the MIC throughout the treatment. It is concluded that continuous infusion of the same total daily dose provides significant activity as compared with fractionated infusion. This study confirms that a concentration of 4-5 x MIC is a reasonable therapeutic target in most clinical settings of severe P. aeruginosa infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11328773     DOI: 10.1093/jac/47.5.617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  12 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in critical illness.

Authors:  Rina Mehrotra; Raffaele De Gaudio; Mark Palazzo
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Antimicrobial treatment of febrile neutropenia: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations.

Authors:  Tiphaine Goulenok; Bruno Fantin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  In vivo efficacy of continuous infusion versus intermittent dosing of linezolid compared to vancomycin in a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus rabbit endocarditis model.

Authors:  Cédric Jacqueline; Eric Batard; Lucia Perez; David Boutoille; Antoine Hamel; Jocelyne Caillon; Marie-France Kergueris; Gilles Potel; Denis Bugnon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  High-dose continuous infusion beta-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Brad Moriyama; Stacey A Henning; Richard Childs; Steven M Holland; Victoria L Anderson; John C Morris; Wyndham H Wilson; George L Drusano; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Lung deposition of continuous and intermittent intravenous ceftazidime in experimental Pseudomonas aeruginosa bronchopneumonia.

Authors:  Cassio Girardi; Marc Tonnellier; Ivan Goldstein; Alfonso Sartorius; Frederic Wallet; Jean-Jacques Rouby
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids enhance the activities of ceftazidime and amikacin in experimental sepsis caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Maria Mouktaroudi; Theodoros Adamis; Vassilios Koussoulas; Fotini Baziaka; Despina Perrea; Panayotis E Karayannacos; Helen Giamarellou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Immunomodulatory clarithromycin treatment of experimental sepsis and acute pyelonephritis caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Theodoros Adamis; George Laoutaris; Lambros Sabracos; Vassilios Koussoulas; Maria Mouktaroudi; Despina Perrea; Panayotis E Karayannacos; Helen Giamarellou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Clarithromycin is an effective immunomodulator when administered late in experimental pyelonephritis by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Anastasia Antonopoulou; Maria Raftogiannis; Pantelis Koutoukas; Thomas Tsaganos; Vassiliki Tziortzioti; Charalambos Panagou; Theodoros Adamis; Helen Giamarellou
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Synergistic Interaction Between Phage Therapy and Antibiotics Clears Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection in Endocarditis and Reduces Virulence.

Authors:  Frank Oechslin; Philippe Piccardi; Stefano Mancini; Jérôme Gabard; Philippe Moreillon; José M Entenza; Gregory Resch; Yok-Ai Que
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 10.  Antibiotic selection in the treatment of acute invasive infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guidelines by the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Mensa; J Barberán; A Soriano; P Llinares; F Marco; R Cantón; G Bou; J González Del Castillo; E Maseda; J R Azanza; J Pasquau; C García-Vidal; J M Reguera; D Sousa; J Gómez; M Montejo; M Borges; A Torres; F Alvarez-Lerma; M Salavert; R Zaragoza; A Oliver
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.