Literature DB >> 12434944

Contrasting emotional approach coping with passive coping for chronic myofascial pain.

Julie A Smith1, Mark A Lumley, David J Longo.   

Abstract

Passive or emotion-focused coping strategies are typically related to worse pain and adjustment among chronic pain patients. Emotional approach coping (EAC), however, is a type of emotion-focused coping that appears to be adaptive in some nonpain populations but has not yet been examined in a chronic pain population. In a sample of 80 patients (75% women, M = 48.67 years of age) with chronic myofascial pain, we contrasted how EAC (assessed with the Emotional Approach Coping Scale) and 5 passive pain-coping strategies (assessed with the Vanderbilt Multidimensional Pain Coping Inventory (VMPCI)) were related to sensory and affective pain, physical impairment, and depression. Passive coping strategies were positively correlated with one another, but EAC was inversely correlated with most of them. The VMPCI passive strategies were substantially positively related to negative affect, whereas EAC was inversely related to negative affect. Controlling for potentially confounding demographics, higher EAC was related to less affective pain and depression, even after controlling for negative affect. Using passive coping strategies, in contrast, was associated with more pain, impairment, and depression, although these relations were greatly attenuated after controlling for negative affect. When considered simultaneously, EAC, but not passive coping, was related to affective pain, and both EAC and passive coping were significant correlates of depression, although in opposite directions. In secondary analyses, we found that EAC was related to less pain (particularly sensory) among men and to less depression among women. Unlike the use of passive pain-coping strategies, which are associated with worse pain and adjustment, the use of EAC (emotional processing and emotional expression) with chronic pain is associated with less pain and depression. This suggests that some emotion-focused types of pain coping may be adaptive, and it highlights the need to assess emotional coping processes that are not confounded with distress or dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12434944     DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2404_09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Behav Med        ISSN: 0883-6612


  18 in total

1.  Recurrent Abdominal Pain in Primary and Tertiary Care: Differences and Similarities.

Authors:  Danita I Czyzewski; Michelle N Eakin; Mariella M Lane; Monica Jarrett; Robert J Shulman
Journal:  Child Health Care       Date:  2007-05-02

2.  The health effects of at-home written emotional disclosure in fibromyalgia: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Mazy E Gillis; Mark A Lumley; Angelia Mosley-Williams; James C C Leisen; Timothy Roehrs
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-10

3.  Type D personality and chronic pain: construct and concurrent validity of the DS14.

Authors:  Michael D Barnett; Tracey Ledoux; Luz M Garcini; Jeff Baker
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2009-03-05

4.  Affect balance style, experimental pain sensitivity, and pain-related responses.

Authors:  Kimberly T Sibille; Lindsay L Kindler; Toni L Glover; Roland Staud; Joseph L Riley; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Assessing Anger Expression: Construct Validity of Three Emotion Expression-Related Measures.

Authors:  Matthew J Jasinski; Mark A Lumley; Deborah V Latsch; Erik Schuster; Ellen Kinner; John W Burns
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2016-06-01

6.  Emotional approach coping in older adults as predictor of physical and mental health.

Authors:  Michael A Hoyt; Ashley Wei-Ting Wang; Ian A Boggero; Tory A Eisenlohr-Moul; Annette L Stanton; Suzanne C Segerstrom
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2020-04-09

7.  Psychological variables potentially implicated in opioid-related mortality as observed in clinical practice.

Authors:  Steven D Passik; Amy Lowery
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.750

8.  Understanding the utility of emotional approach coping: evidence from a laboratory stressor and daily life.

Authors:  Vanessa Juth; Sally S Dickerson; Peggy M Zoccola; Suman Lam
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2014-06-13

9.  A comparison of emotional approach coping (EAC) between individuals with anxiety disorders and nonanxious controls.

Authors:  Luana Marques; Rebecca E Kaufman; Richard T LeBeau; Samantha J Moshier; Michael W Otto; Mark H Pollack; Naomi M Simon
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.243

10.  Emotion regulation in patients with rheumatic diseases: validity and responsiveness of the Emotional Approach Coping Scale (EAC).

Authors:  Heidi A Zangi; Andrew Garratt; Kåre Birger Hagen; Annette L Stanton; Petter Mowinckel; Arnstein Finset
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.