OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between changes in ejection fraction during the first three months after acute myocardial infarction and myocardial viability. PATIENTS: Myocardial viability was assessed using low dose dobutamine echocardiography in 107 patients at mean (SD) 3 (1) days after acute myocardial infarction. Cross sectional echocardiography was repeated three months later. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were determined from apical views using the Simpson biplane formula. RESULTS: In patients with viability, ejection fraction increased by 4.4 (4.3)%; in patients without viability it remained unchanged (0.04 (3.6)%; p < 0.001). A > or = 5% increase in ejection fraction was present in 21 of 107 patients (20%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that myocardial viability in > or = 2 segments predicted this increase in ejection fraction with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 65%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to define which clinical and echocardiographic variables were related to > or = 5% improvement in ejection fraction. Myocardial viability, non-Q wave infarction, and anterior infarction all emerged as independent predictors, myocardial viability being the best (chi(2) = 14.5; p = 0.0001). Using the regression equation, the probability of > or = 5% improvement in ejection fraction for patients with a non-Q wave anterior infarct with viability was 73%, and for patients with a Q wave inferior infarct without viability, only 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction is the single best predictor of improvement in ejection fraction. In combination with infarct location and Q wave presence, the probability of > or = 5% improvement can be estimated in individual patients at the bedside.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between changes in ejection fraction during the first three months after acute myocardial infarction and myocardial viability. PATIENTS: Myocardial viability was assessed using low dose dobutamine echocardiography in 107 patients at mean (SD) 3 (1) days after acute myocardial infarction. Cross sectional echocardiography was repeated three months later. Left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were determined from apical views using the Simpson biplane formula. RESULTS: In patients with viability, ejection fraction increased by 4.4 (4.3)%; in patients without viability it remained unchanged (0.04 (3.6)%; p < 0.001). A > or = 5% increase in ejection fraction was present in 21 of 107 patients (20%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that myocardial viability in > or = 2 segments predicted this increase in ejection fraction with a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 65%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to define which clinical and echocardiographic variables were related to > or = 5% improvement in ejection fraction. Myocardial viability, non-Q wave infarction, and anterior infarction all emerged as independent predictors, myocardial viability being the best (chi(2) = 14.5; p = 0.0001). Using the regression equation, the probability of > or = 5% improvement in ejection fraction for patients with a non-Q wave anterior infarct with viability was 73%, and for patients with a Q wave inferior infarct without viability, only 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial viability after acute myocardial infarction is the single best predictor of improvement in ejection fraction. In combination with infarct location and Q wave presence, the probability of > or = 5% improvement can be estimated in individual patients at the bedside.
Authors: D J Kereiakes; R M Califf; B S George; S Ellis; J Samaha; R Stack; L H Martin; S Young; E J Topol Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1991-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: J K Harrison; R M Califf; L H Woodlief; D Kereiakes; B S George; R S Stack; S G Ellis; K L Lee; W O'Neill; E J Topol Journal: Circulation Date: 1993-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S C Smart; S Sawada; T Ryan; D Segar; L Atherton; K Berkovitz; P D Bourdillon; H Feigenbaum Journal: Circulation Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A Volpi; C De Vita; M G Franzosi; E Geraci; A P Maggioni; F Mauri; E Negri; E Santoro; L Tavazzi; G Tognoni Journal: Circulation Date: 1993-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H Watada; H Ito; H Oh; T Masuyama; M Aburaya; M Hori; M Iwakura; Y Higashino; K Fujii; T Minamino Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 24.094