Literature DB >> 1957746

Low-dose dobutamine in patients with acute myocardial infarction identifies viable but not contractile myocardium and predicts the magnitude of improvement in wall motion abnormalities in response to coronary revascularization.

F Barilla1, M Gheorghiade, M Alam, F Khaja, S Goldstein.   

Abstract

To assess the effects of coronary revascularization on viable but noncontractile myocardium, we examined 21 patients with a documented anterior acute myocardial infarction who had a significant improvement in wall motion abnormality evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiography in the infarct-related artery in response to low-dose dobutamine infusion. All patients had a significant residual stenosis in the infarct-related artery. In response to low-dose dobutamine, there was a marked improvement in contractility in the infarct-related area segments and this was reflected by a decrease in echocardiographic score index from 1.5 +/- 0.15 to 1.09 +/- 0.08 (p = 0.0001). Of these 21 patients, 13 underwent successful revascularization: 10 had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and three had coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) (group I). Eight patients received medical therapy only (group II). At 40 +/- 15 days of follow-up, both groups had improvement in their segmental wall motion abnormalities. However, the improvement in group I was greater than that in group II, 1.1 +/- 0.13 and 1.35 +/- 0.1, respectively (p = 0.0002). We conclude that: (1) low-dose dobutamine infusion may identify viable but noncontractile myocardium in patients with acute myocardial infarction and (2) in these patients revascularization causes a greater improvement in left ventricular function over time when compared with a nonrevascularized group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1957746     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90267-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  28 in total

1.  Assessment of Regional Viability in the Infarct Zone Following Myocardial Infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  R Senior; M Monaghan; H Becher; J Mayet; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Dobutamine stress echocardiography: does it predict response to beta-blockers in patients with heart failure?

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Khashayar Hematpour; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2006-06

4.  Myocardial viability: impact on left ventricular dilatation after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  F Nijland; O Kamp; P M J Verhorst; W G de Voogt; H G Bosch; C A Visser
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Stress radionuclide studies after acute myocardial infarction: changes with revascularization.

Authors:  I Coma-Canella; M del Val Gómez; L Salazar; F Gallardo
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  A challenge to the nuclear cardiology laboratory: imaging goals in patients after infarction.

Authors:  T P Rocco; M A Pfeffer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  The role of stress echocardiography versus stress perfusion: a view from the other side.

Authors:  F A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Stress echocardiography for assessing myocardial ischaemia and viable myocardium.

Authors:  R Senior; A Kenny; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Full recovery of contraction late after acute myocardial infarction: determinants and early predictors.

Authors:  P Lancellotti; A Albert; C Berthe; L A Piérard
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography for predicting functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Adrian C Borges; Wolf S Richter; Christian Witzel; Matthias Witzel; Andrea Grohmann; Rona K Reibis; Wolfgang Rutsch; Ingeborg Küchler; Dieter L Munz; Gert Baumann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.