Literature DB >> 12433124

Investigation of Kodak extended dose range (EDR) film for megavoltage photon beam dosimetry.

Indrin J Chetty1, Paule M Charland.   

Abstract

We have investigated the dependence of the measured optical density on the incident beam energy, field size and depth for a new type of film, Kodak extended dose range (Kodak EDR). Film measurements have been conducted over a range of field sizes (3 x 3 cm2 to 25 x 25 cm2) and depths (d(max) to 15 cm), for 6 MV and 15 MV photons within a solid water phantom, and the variation in sensitometric response (net optical density versus dose) has been reported. Kodak EDR film is found to have a linear response with dose, from 0 to 350 cGy, which is much higher than that typically seen for Kodak XV film (0-50 cGy). The variation in sensitometric response for Kodak EDR film as a function of field size and depth is observed to be similar to that of Kodak XV film; the optical density varied in the order of 2-3% for field sizes of 3 x 3 cm2 and 10 x 10 cm2 at depths of d(max), 5 cm and 15 cm in the phantom. Measurements for a 25 x 25 cm2 field size showed consistently higher optical densities at depths of d(max), 5 cm and 15 cm, relative to a 10 x 10 cm2 field size at 5 cm depth, with 4-5% differences noted at a depth of 15 cm. Fractional depth dose and profiles conducted with Kodak EDR film showed good agreement (2%/2 mm) with ion chamber measurements for all field sizes except for the 25 x 25 cm2 at depths greater than 15 cm, where differences in the order of 3-5% were observed. In addition, Kodak EDR film measurements were found to be consistent with those of Kodak XV film for all fractional depth doses and profiles. The results of this study indicate that Kodak EDR film may be a useful tool for relative dosimetry at higher dose ranges.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12433124     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/20/305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Optimal sensitometric curves of Kodak EDR2 film for dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy verification.

Authors:  S Suriyapee; N Pitaxtarnin; S Oonsiri; C Jumpangern; I Israngkul Na Ayuthaya
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2008-01-01

2.  Quantitative megavoltage radiation therapy dosimetry using the storage phosphor KCl: Eu2+.

Authors:  Zhaohui Han; Joseph P Driewer; Yuanshui Zheng; Daniel A Low; H Harold Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Eight years of IMRT quality assurance with ionization chambers and film dosimetry: experience of the Montpellier Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Authors:  Pascal Fenoglietto; Benoit Laliberté; Norbert Aillères; Olivier Riou; Jean-Bernard Dubois; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Use of a matchline dosimetry analysis tool (MDAT) to quantify dose homogeneity in the region between abutting tangential and supraclavicular radiation fields.

Authors:  Kenneth L Homann; B Earl Gates; Mohammad Salehpour; David S Followill; Steven M Kirsner; R Allen White; Thomas A Buchholz; Karl L Prado
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Radiographic film dosimetry for IMRT fields in the nearsurface buildup region.

Authors:  Peter L Roberson; Jean M Moran; Ravi Kulasekere
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Accuracy of rapid radiographic film calibration for intensity-modulated radiation therapy verification.

Authors:  Ravi Kulasekere; Jean M Moran; Benedick A Fraass; Peter L Roberson
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Errors introduced by dose scaling for relative dosimetry.

Authors:  Yoichi Watanabe; Naoki Hayashi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Dosimetric comparison of extended dose range film with ionization measurements in water and lung equivalent heterogeneous media exposed to megavoltage photons.

Authors:  Paule M Charland; Indrin J Chetty; Shigeru Yokoyama; Benedick A Fraass
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.