Literature DB >> 12432089

The signal of ancient introns is obscured by intron density and homolog number.

Scott William Roy1, Alexei Fedorov, Walter Gilbert.   

Abstract

In ancient genes whose products have known 3-dimensional structures, an excess of phase zero introns (those that lie between the codons) appear in the boundaries of modules, compact regions of the polypeptide chain. These excesses are highly significant and could support the hypothesis that ancient genes were assembled by exon shuffling involving compact modules. (Phase one and two introns, and many phase zero introns, appear to arise later.) However, as more genes, with larger numbers of homologs and intron positions, were examined, the effects became smaller, dropping from a 40% excess to an 8% excess as the number of intron positions increased from 570 to 3,328, even though the statistical significance remained strong. An interpretation of this behavior is that novel inserted positions appearing in homologs washed out the signal from a finite number of ancient positions. Here we show that this is likely to be the case. Analyses of intron positions restricted to those in genes for which relatively few intron positions from homologs are known, or to those in genes with a small number of known homologous gene structures, show a significant correlation of phase zero intron positions with the module structure, which weakens as the density of attributed intron positions or the number of homologs increases. These effects do not appear for phase one and phase two introns. This finding matches the expectation of the mixed model of intron origin, in which a fraction of phase zero introns are left from the assembly of the first genes, while other introns have been added in the course of evolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12432089      PMCID: PMC137748          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.242600199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  17 in total

1.  Centripetal modules and ancient introns.

Authors:  S W Roy; M Nosaka; S J de Souza; W Gilbert
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1999-09-30       Impact factor: 3.688

2.  Intron distribution difference for 276 ancient and 131 modern genes suggests the existence of ancient introns.

Authors:  A Fedorov; X Cao; S Saxonov; S J de Souza; S W Roy; W Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  On the antiquity of introns.

Authors:  W Gilbert; M Marchionni; G McKnight
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-07-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  The recent origins of spliceosomal introns revisited.

Authors:  J M Logsdon
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Selfish DNA and the origin of introns.

Authors:  T Cavalier-Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 May 23-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The exon theory of genes.

Authors:  W Gilbert
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1987

7.  Exons--present from the beginning?

Authors:  C Blake
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Dec 8-14       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Why genes in pieces?

Authors:  W Gilbert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-02-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Correlation of DNA exonic regions with protein structural units in haemoglobin.

Authors:  M Go
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Evidence that introns arose at proto-splice sites.

Authors:  N J Dibb; A J Newman
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  7 in total

1.  Xpro: database of eukaryotic protein-encoding genes.

Authors:  Vivek Gopalan; Tin Wee Tan; Bernett T K Lee; Shoba Ranganathan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Phylogenetic and exon-intron structure analysis of fungal subtilisins: support for a mixed model of intron evolution.

Authors:  Chengshu Wang; Milton A Typas; Tariq M Butt
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Can codon usage bias explain intron phase distributions and exon symmetry?

Authors:  A Ruvinsky; S T Eskesen; F N Eskesen; L D Hurst
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Signs of ancient and modern exon-shuffling are correlated to the distribution of ancient and modern domains along proteins.

Authors:  Maria Dulcetti Vibranovski; Noboru Jo Sakabe; Rodrigo Soares de Oliveira; Sandro José de Souza
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  The exon context and distribution of Euascomycetes rRNA spliceosomal introns.

Authors:  Debashish Bhattacharya; Dawn Simon; Jian Huang; Jamie J Cannone; Robin R Gutell
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  SOBA: sequence ontology bioinformatics analysis.

Authors:  Barry Moore; Guozhen Fan; Karen Eilbeck
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Large-scale trends in the evolution of gene structures within 11 animal genomes.

Authors:  Mark Yandell; Chris J Mungall; Chris Smith; Simon Prochnik; Joshua Kaminker; George Hartzell; Suzanna Lewis; Gerald M Rubin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 4.475

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.