Literature DB >> 10570987

Centripetal modules and ancient introns.

S W Roy1, M Nosaka, S J de Souza, W Gilbert.   

Abstract

We have created an algorithm which instantiates the centripetal definition of modules, compact regions of protein structure, as introduced by Go and Nosaka (M. Go and M. Nosaka, 1987. Protein architecture and the origin of introns. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Bio. 52, 915-924). That definition seeks the minima of a function that sums the squares of C-alpha carbon distances over a window around each amino acid residue in a three-dimensional protein structure and identifies such minima with module boundaries. We analyze a set of 44 ancient conserved proteins, with known three-dimensional structures, which have intronless homologues in bacteria and intron-containing homologues in the eukaryotes, with a corresponding set of 988 intron positions. We show that the phase zero intron positions are significantly correlated with the module boundaries (p = 0.0002), while the intron positions that lie within codons, in phase one and phase two, are not correlated with these 'centripetal' module boundaries. Furthermore, we analyze the phylogenetic distribution of intron positions and identify a subset of putatively 'ancient' intron positions: phase zero positions in one phylogenetic kingdom which have an associated intron either in an identical position or within three codons in another phylogenetic kingdom (a notion of intron sliding). This subset of 120 'ancient' introns lies closer to the module boundaries than does the full set of phase zero introns with high significance, a p-value of 0.008. We conclude that the behavior of this set of introns supports the prediction of a mixed theory: that some introns are very old and were used for exon shuffling in the progenote, while many introns have been lost and added since.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10570987     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00292-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  12 in total

1.  Intron distribution difference for 276 ancient and 131 modern genes suggests the existence of ancient introns.

Authors:  A Fedorov; X Cao; S Saxonov; S J de Souza; S W Roy; W Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The signal of ancient introns is obscured by intron density and homolog number.

Authors:  Scott William Roy; Alexei Fedorov; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A new Drosophila spliceosomal intron position is common in plants.

Authors:  Rosa Tarrio; Francisco Rodríguez-Trelles; Francisco J Ayala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes.

Authors:  Alexei Fedorov; Amir Feisal Merican; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  When proteome meets genome: the alpha helix and the beta strand of proteins are eschewed by mRNA splice junctions and may define the minimal indivisible modules of protein architecture.

Authors:  Sailen Barik
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Evolutionary dynamics of spliceosomal intron revealed by in silico analyses of the P-Type ATPase superfamily genes.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Oda; Ryosuke L Ohniwa; Yuki Suzuki; Masatsugu Denawa; Masahiro Kumeta; Hideyuki Okamura; Kunio Takeyasu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Phylogenetic and exon-intron structure analysis of fungal subtilisins: support for a mixed model of intron evolution.

Authors:  Chengshu Wang; Milton A Typas; Tariq M Butt
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Signs of ancient and modern exon-shuffling are correlated to the distribution of ancient and modern domains along proteins.

Authors:  Maria Dulcetti Vibranovski; Noboru Jo Sakabe; Rodrigo Soares de Oliveira; Sandro José de Souza
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Signatures of domain shuffling in the human genome.

Authors:  Henrik Kaessmann; Sebastian Zöllner; Anton Nekrutenko; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  A phylogeny of caenorhabditis reveals frequent loss of introns during nematode evolution.

Authors:  Soochin Cho; Suk-Won Jin; Adam Cohen; Ronald E Ellis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.